Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v2.11.x: fixup the intel-signed/sof-arl.ri link #180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

kv2019i
Copy link
Collaborator

@kv2019i kv2019i commented Nov 4, 2024

Modify the symbolic link to explicitly link intel-signed/sof-arl.ri to the intel-signed/sof-mtl.ri binary.

This is first such symbolic link for a intel-signed image, so better to set a clean first example as this approach is likely to be copied to handle other similar cases.

Modify the symbolic link to explicitly link intel-signed/sof-arl.ri
to the intel-signed/sof-mtl.ri binary.

This is first such symbolic link for a intel-signed image,
so better to set a clean first example as this approach is likely
to be copied to handle other similar cases.

Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <[email protected]>
../../mtl/intel-signed/sof-mtl.ri
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

../../mtl/sof-mtl.ri is pointing to ../../mtl/intel-signed/sof-mtl.ri, right?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ujfalusi ack, no functional difference, but just looking at convention, we already have communty/sof-foo.ri pointing to community/sof-bar.ri in case same binaries can be used, so to keep consistency, we should do the same for intel-signed/sof-foo.ri.

@kv2019i kv2019i merged commit ab57597 into thesofproject:main Nov 6, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants