Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore(deps): bump google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.25.0 to 1.27.1 in /api #117

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore(deps): bump google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.25.0 to 1.27.1 in /api #117

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 5, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Bumps google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.25.0 to 1.27.1.

Release notes

Sourced from google.golang.org/protobuf's releases.

v1.27.1

Notable changes since v1.27.0:

  • CL/331149: cmd/protoc-gen-go: fix generation of enum defaults

v1.27.0

Overview

The release provides new functionality for iterating through a message using protobuf reflection. There are some minor changes to the code generator.

Notable changes

New features:

  • CL/309669: testing/protopack: add Message.UnmarshalAbductive

Bug fixes:

  • CL/317430: encoding/prototext: fix skipping of unknown fields
  • CL/321529: internal/impl: support typed nil source for Merge of aberrant messages

Generator changes

  • CL/305574: cmd/protoc-gen-go: remove generation of the ExtensionRangeArray method
  • CL/319649: cmd/protoc-gen-go: avoid referencing remote enum values by name
  • CL/316949: compiler/protogen: relax rules for valid import paths
  • CL/306209: cmd/protoc-gen-go: add protoc suffix

Reflectively ranging over a message

  • CL/236540: reflect: add protopath and protorange packages

The new reflect/protorange package supports recursively ranging through all populated fields of a message. There are many use cases for such a feature. See the examples for inspiration.

Upcoming breakage changes

This release removes generation of the ExtensionRangeArray method, as originally announced since the v1.20.0 release on March 2nd, 2020. Our analysis of the entire public module proxy found no static usages of this method. This method is pseudo-internal to the implementation and we expect removal of it to have no material impact. If something is broken by this change, please file an issue and we can consider re-generating this method in a patch release.

There are no new upcoming breaking changes to announce in this release.

v1.26.0

... (truncated)

Commits
  • b92717e all: release v1.27.1
  • 177d70e README.md: mention protopath and protorange packages
  • aa432c0 cmd/protoc-gen-go: fix generation of enum defaults
  • 49b6f72 all: start v1.27.0-devel
  • 3f51f05 all: release v1.27.0
  • dc57387 release.bash: make work on Linux
  • 21e33cc reflect/protoregistry: restore conflicting file names check
  • 426f20b release.bash: make work on macOS
  • febffdd reflect/protoregistry: permit conflicting file names
  • 4c193d1 compiler/protogen: relax rules for valid import paths
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot
chore(deps): bump google.golang.org/protobuf in /api
1eb9d8d 
Bumps [google.golang.org/protobuf](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf-go) from 1.25.0 to 1.27.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf-go/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf-go/blob/master/release.bash)
- [Commits](protocolbuffers/protobuf-go@v1.25.0...v1.27.1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: google.golang.org/protobuf
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 5, 2021

The following labels could not be found: dependencies.

@dependabot dependabot bot mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2021
Closed
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 30, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

19 similar comments
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 10, 2021

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 3, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 6, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 7, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 7, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 11, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 18, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 21, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 25, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 1, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 7, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 24, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 1, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github May 3, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 8, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 18, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 22, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 26, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 29, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants