Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test breaking change mlc in js #3451

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

wanlwanl
Copy link
Member

@wanlwanl wanlwanl commented Aug 6, 2024

Choose a PR Template

Switch to "Preview" on this description then select one of the choices below.

Click here to open a PR for a Data Plane API.

Click here to open a PR for a Control Plane (ARM) API.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app-test bot commented Aug 6, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ The required check named Swagger BreakingChange has failed. To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app-test bot commented Aug 6, 2024

PR validation pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

This reverts commit c26fc6a.
@wanlwanl wanlwanl marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2024 03:40
@raych1 raych1 merged commit b7d3377 into test-repo-billy:main Aug 6, 2024
21 of 25 checks passed
chunyu3 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
* test breaking change mlc in js (#3451)

* `

* `

* Revert "`"

This reverts commit c26fc6a.

* Update specificationRepositoryConfiguration.json (#3457)

* Update specificationRepositoryConfiguration.json (#3459)

* Update specificationRepositoryConfiguration.json (#3462)

Revert python repo branch change as it was deleted.

* Update specificationRepositoryConfiguration.json (#3463)

* Migrate typespec-validation.yml to GH Actions

* path, fetch depth

* Introduce error

* Test a feature that AI says will collapse logs (doubtful it'll work)

* Revert "Test a feature that AI says will collapse logs (doubtful it'll work)"

This reverts commit 04aed83.

* Log $LASTEXITCODE

* Invalid syntax

* Use error logging, remove continue-on-error because that is different behavior in GitHub Actions compared to ignoreLASTEXITCODE

* Errors also get annotations in GitHub Actions

* String replacement

* Revert Logging-Functions.ps1

* Test composite action

* File location

* Invocation

* Add typespec-validation-all.yml

* Migrate typespec-validation-all.yml

* Revert main.tsp invalid spec

* fetch-depth: 2

* Long paths

* checkout@v4

* Remove pipelines

* *.yml -> *.yaml

* Do not change specificationRepositoryConfiguration.json

* Job names (for checks)

* Add Skip/Take logic and matrix

* Syntax

* Rename

* Remove "shell"

* Try defaults.run.shell (unlikely to work)

* bash

* Name for actions/setup-node@v4 does not appear in the logs. Remove.

* Use sharding semantics

* Shard

* Review feedback

* Review feedback

* +1

* Revert "Shard"... Display is confusing because it starts at 0 and doesn't reach total-shards. Math is not allowed in expressions.

This reverts commit 035bec7.

* Shard only if TotalShards > 0

* Remove description (schema validaiton does not pass, let's see what GH Actions says)

* The `description` property is not absolutely required by GH Actions at this time but adding back in because schema requires it.

* Add array functions and tests

* Move Copy-ApiVersion.Tests.ps1 out of folder (adjust paths so they are accurate)

* Add trailing newline

* Add trailing newline

* Update .github/workflows/typespec-validation.yaml

Co-authored-by: Mike Harder <[email protected]>

* Review feedback

* Update eng/scripts/TypeSpec-Validation.ps1

Co-authored-by: Mike Harder <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Peng Jiahui <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuchao Yan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ray Chen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mike Harder <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants