Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate convenience fields in google_compute_snapshot #173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2018

Conversation

modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Contributor

@paddycarver paddycarver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I only commented on the CustomizeDiff stuff, and only for one resource, so far, because I feel like updating it once will update it everywhere, right? And also, that's what I was specifically asked to give feedback on.

A few minor points, but overall, I think the logic covers the cases well, and makes sense to me?

I'll continue reviewing the rest, I just wanted to surface this early.

google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/compute_snapshot.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
google-beta/resource_compute_snapshot.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@rileykarson
Copy link
Collaborator

Ah, nope - all of those were unintentional. Once the Magician is done they should be fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@paddycarver paddycarver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming tests pass, the code looks reasonable to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@nat-henderson nat-henderson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comments as in hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#2572 (review) - once resolved, lgtm

@rileykarson rileykarson merged commit 1b05176 into hashicorp:2.0.0 Dec 5, 2018
nat-henderson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2018
<!-- This change is generated by MagicModules. -->
/cc @rileykarson
nat-henderson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2018
<!-- This change is generated by MagicModules. -->
/cc @rileykarson
@modular-magician modular-magician deleted the codegen-pr-987 branch November 15, 2024 20:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants