-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update azure-sdk-for-go to v46.1.0 #8411
Update azure-sdk-for-go to v46.1.0 #8411
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ArcturusZhang Thanks for the PR! LGTM! 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and it appears there's a couple of changes necessary here to not send a misleading value here?
Thanks!
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ func resourceArmApiManagementUserCreateUpdate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta inter | |||
properties.UserCreateParameterProperties.State = apimanagement.UserState(state) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if _, err := client.CreateOrUpdate(ctx, resourceGroup, serviceName, userId, properties, ""); err != nil { | |||
if _, err := client.CreateOrUpdate(ctx, resourceGroup, serviceName, userId, properties, nil, ""); err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's this nil value here? as per the last PR this is expecting where this resource is being created/updated - so sending the Old/New Portal is misleading - presumably we should be sending terraform
here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This new parameter is notify
- I will try to pass terraform
to appType
in other two methods and see if it works
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ArcturusZhang can we set this to true/false (matching the default value used in the other resources) here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem. On my way. BTW do we need to revert those changes on the apimanagement identity?
azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement/api_management_subscription_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Taking a look through here, if we can fix up the one comment (to pass the same notify value as the other resources) - and the tests look good then this otherwise seems fine 👍
Thanks!
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ func resourceArmApiManagementUserCreateUpdate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta inter | |||
properties.UserCreateParameterProperties.State = apimanagement.UserState(state) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if _, err := client.CreateOrUpdate(ctx, resourceGroup, serviceName, userId, properties, ""); err != nil { | |||
if _, err := client.CreateOrUpdate(ctx, resourceGroup, serviceName, userId, properties, nil, ""); err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ArcturusZhang can we set this to true/false (matching the default value used in the other resources) here?
8ffe42a
to
49b269e
Compare
Maybe we should also remove the |
This has been released in version 2.29.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.29.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
No description provided.