Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(v2.8): feeshare module specs #217

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 23, 2023
Merged

docs(v2.8): feeshare module specs #217

merged 10 commits into from
Nov 23, 2023

Conversation

evanorti
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates the original FeeShare spec to reflect the changes implemented by PR 206. I have also added a short README to our custom WASM module wrapper.

@evanorti evanorti requested a review from emidev98 November 22, 2023 22:24
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release/v2.8@ec11083). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             release/v2.8     #217   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   68.13%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?       45           
  Lines                   ?     2150           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     1465           
  Misses                  ?      524           
  Partials                ?      161           

@emidev98 emidev98 changed the title FeeShare documentation update. docs(v2.8): feeshare module specs Nov 23, 2023
@emidev98 emidev98 merged commit 18ba913 into release/v2.8 Nov 23, 2023
9 checks passed
@emidev98 emidev98 deleted the feat/feeshare-spec branch November 23, 2023 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants