Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make run name wrap better for the run-selector #1602

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2018
Merged

Make run name wrap better for the run-selector #1602

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2018

Conversation

dgrahn
Copy link
Contributor

@dgrahn dgrahn commented Nov 8, 2018

Adds proposed changes from #1549.

@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers

@dgrahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dgrahn commented Nov 8, 2018

I signed it!

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

@dgrahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dgrahn commented Nov 8, 2018

@nfelt Not to steal your issue. I just had this code already, thought I'd jumpstart the review process.

@stephanwlee stephanwlee changed the title Make wrapping of hyperparam strings better. Make run name wrap better for the run-selector Nov 8, 2018
@nfelt nfelt mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2018
@nfelt nfelt merged commit 2feb7dc into tensorflow:master Nov 9, 2018
stephanwlee pushed a commit to stephanwlee/tensorboard that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2018
stephanwlee pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants