-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates tektonPipeline to make it independent of tektonConfig #600
Conversation
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
@nikhil-thomas I have verified this PR resolve TargetNamespace issue |
Thanks @savitaashture 👍 @PuneetPunamiya Functionally this patch looks great. I have a few comments regarding code organization. We shall merge this once those are addressed. 🧑💻 |
ce3c09d
to
c80fb40
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
9aade37
to
38bd9a2
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
Can you add UT for this |
38bd9a2
to
f982a72
Compare
/hold |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
@@ -219,6 +194,10 @@ func (r *Reconciler) ensureTargetNamespaceExists(ctx context.Context, tc *v1alph | |||
} | |||
} | |||
} else { | |||
labels := map[string]string{"operator.tekton.dev/targetNamespace": "true"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can see that the following label already exists at line https://github.com/tektoncd/operator/pull/600/files#diff-de56e5fd636d3b9b5ab99eb6197436045c5bc27187a3f59649bae7d66a8e7202R19, so do we still need to pass this label from here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So from the tektonConfig I have removed but in the tektonPipelines we need it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is it not needed in tektonConfig. I was thinking we will need it in both TektonConfig and TektonPipeline.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is needed in tektonConfig as well, but the reason I've remove this variable because, in the createTargetNamespace
function itself I'm adding that label while creating the namespace. For ref: please see here
f982a72
to
8106861
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
4b36022
to
cd2b281
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/test pull-tekton-operator-integration-tests |
cd2b281
to
2e5673d
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
2e5673d
to
d0ab42a
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/hold cancel |
d0ab42a
to
0051cdd
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
0051cdd
to
617022b
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/test pull-tekton-operator-integration-tests |
617022b
to
cf46a04
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: savitaashture, vdemeester The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
- With the addition of operator version config map getting created in tektonConfig, the targetNamespace was getting created in tektonConfig reconciler, but if tektonConfig is not installed and tektonPipeline is supposed to installed alone then it won't be installed as it would miss the targetNamespace. So this patch checks for the targetNamespace in tektonPipeline reconciler, if it is not present then it creates the targetNamespace and also the operator version config map i.e. makes tektonPipeline independent of tektonConfig Signed-off-by: Puneet Punamiya <[email protected]>
cf46a04
to
529511c
Compare
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
Changes
With the addition of operator version config map
operators-info
getting created in tektonConfig, the targetNamespace was getting
created in tektonConfig reconciler, but if
tektonConfig
is not installedand
tektonPipeline
is supposed to installed alone then it won'tbe installed as it would miss the targetNamespace.
So this patch checks for the targetNamespace in
tektonPipeline
reconciler, if it is not present then it creates the targetNamespace
and also the operator version config map i.e. makes tektonPipeline
independent of tektonConfig
Signed-off-by: Puneet Punamiya [email protected]
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
See the contribution guide for more details.
Release Notes