Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.

Issues: tc39/proposal-private-fields

15 Open 86 Closed
15 Open 86 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

dynamic private names?
#117 opened Apr 18, 2021 by jimmywarting
7
Friend class/function
#108 opened Nov 4, 2017 by D504
9
Any real pitfalls to the WeakMap approach?
#105 opened Sep 23, 2017 by mmiller42
16
Dynamic Access of Private FIelds
#104 opened Aug 19, 2017 by robbiespeed
16
Usage with Optional Chaining
#101 opened Jul 29, 2017 by boopathi
3
Private fields are tied to classes
#93 opened Jun 13, 2017 by futpib
42
Alternative approach: make everything private but prototype properties
#89 opened Jun 7, 2017 by drpicox
5
Call semantics
#85 opened Jun 7, 2017 by Alxandr
11
Update FAQ regarding the sigil
#84 opened Jun 6, 2017 by jamesplease
3
Align with the Orthogonal Classes framework
#82 opened Apr 8, 2017 by erights
2
Null Propagation
#78 opened Feb 3, 2017 by chicoxyzzy
4
Incomplete without method syntax
#62 opened Nov 29, 2016 by indolering
3
Consider using private keyword AND sigil for declaration
#53 opened Sep 20, 2016 by dalexander01
120
private methods
#37 opened Jul 22, 2016 by graingert
23
Static private?
#24 opened Feb 28, 2016 by erights
5
ProTip! Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.