Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should [[RelevantExtensionKeys]] be pre-alphabetized? #427

Closed
rkirsling opened this issue Apr 16, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #433
Closed

Should [[RelevantExtensionKeys]] be pre-alphabetized? #427

rkirsling opened this issue Apr 16, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #433

Comments

@rkirsling
Copy link
Member

If UTS 35 expects a canonical locale identifier to have its extensions alphabetized, should we update the [[RelevantExtensionKeys]] lists for Collator and DateTimeFormat to have kf before kn and hc before nu, respectively?

There's no alphabetization to do if the list is already in order, and I don't believe this has any impact on the initialization of either class, since we access the options by name.

@littledan
Copy link
Member

@rkirsling It sounds like this would be an editorial change, right? If so, I'm in favor of it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants