-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 786
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publish to npm #118
Comments
Also, this library is excellent. Thanks! |
You can pull it into your project with
I've discussed why I don't want to publish it to npm in #70
You're welcome! |
I feel like there's not much explanation there! Just want to throw in my +1 on publishing to npm, I think it would make the project more successful. |
I get that you don't want different names on npm and bower – it seems wrong and gross. But there's precedent for it, from a very popular library too, velocity.js. See: https://github.com/julianshapiro/velocity
npm git installs are a bit of a second-class citizen. It adds another external dependency to your project install process (if either npm or github is down, you can't install/deploy), and commands like I'd just nab |
@natew Thanks for your input. I often prefer to wait until more/stronger arguments come in before changing things (which is why I left this issue open). @feross I didn't think that there was any difference between installing with a package name and installing with a git repo. I guess I'll publish it as |
Thanks! |
@taye You guys should consider renaming the npm package to "interact-js" or simply "interact" like you have done with bower, as I am getting numerous issues when building and importing with typescript and aurelia because its looking for a file called interact.js and not a folder. I renamed the folder and this fixed my problems. However now, this breaks package.json |
Please publish this to npm! 👍 The package name
interact.js
is available.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: