Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: updates to block_sync diagram #5690

Conversation

hansieodendaal
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Updates to block_sync diagram

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

What process can a PR reviewer use to test or verify this change?

Breaking Changes

  • None
  • Requires data directory on base node to be deleted
  • Requires hard fork
  • Other - Please specify

@github-actions
Copy link

Test Results (CI)

1 192 tests  +1   1 192 ✔️ +1   9m 59s ⏱️ -25s
     37 suites ±0          0 💤 ±0 
       1 files   ±0          0 ±0 

Results for commit a84f0d9. ± Comparison against base commit ad8a50e.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged labels Aug 30, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Test Results (Integration tests)

  2 files  ±0  11 suites  ±0   40m 11s ⏱️ + 26m 16s
27 tests ±0  26 ✔️  - 1  0 💤 ±0  1 +1 
29 runs  +2  26 ✔️  - 1  0 💤 ±0  3 +3 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit a84f0d9. ± Comparison against base commit ad8a50e.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project removed the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Aug 30, 2023
@stringhandler stringhandler merged commit 7ce90be into tari-project:feature-diagrams Aug 30, 2023
12 of 13 checks passed
@hansieodendaal hansieodendaal deleted the ho_block_sync_diagrams branch August 30, 2023 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants