Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(mustache): add tests for new mustache parsing #1771

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

ssddOnTop
Copy link
Member

@ssddOnTop ssddOnTop commented Apr 22, 2024

Summary:
ext of #1767, added tests to mustache.rs

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a test for optional dot expressions in the Mustache module to ensure correct parsing and comparison.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new test for handling optional dot expressions in the Mustache module. The primary focus is on enhancing the module's capability to parse and evaluate these expressions, ensuring that they are correctly interpreted and compared within the template system.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/mustache.rs Added a test for parsing and comparing optional dot expressions.

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6cea61 and d08d621.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/mustache.rs (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
src/mustache.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Programming Style Guidelines

  • When calling functions that do not need to modify values, pass references of those values.
  • When calling functions that need to modify values, pass ownership of the values, and ensure they are returned from the function.

IMPORTANT: This programming style may not be suitable for performance-sensitive components or hot code paths. In such cases, prioritize efficiency and optimization strategies to enhance performance.

Testing

  1. Write Tests: For every new feature or bugfix, ensure that you write appropriate tests.
    Structure your tests in the following way:

    use pretty_assertions::assert_eq;
    fn test_something_important() {
       let value = setup_something_using_a_function();
    
       let actual = perform_some_operation_on_the_value(value);
       let expected = ExpectedValue {foo: 1, bar: 2};
    
       assert_eq!(actual, expected);
    }
    • Setup the value using helper methods in tests.
    • Create an actual and an expected value.
    • Assert the two values in a new line.
    • Ensure there are only one assertions per test.
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/mustache.rs (1)

357-368: The test test_optional_dot_expression correctly checks the parsing of an optional dot expression. However, consider adding more comprehensive tests to cover edge cases and invalid inputs.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added type: chore Routine tasks like conversions, reorganization, and maintenance work. type: feature Brand new functionality, features, pages, workflows, endpoints, etc. labels Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.90%. Comparing base (a6cea61) to head (d08d621).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1771      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.89%   86.90%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         155      155              
  Lines       15600    15612      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        13555    13567      +12     
  Misses       2045     2045              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tusharmath tusharmath enabled auto-merge (squash) April 23, 2024 05:02
@tusharmath tusharmath merged commit 19e1cd8 into main Apr 23, 2024
31 checks passed
@tusharmath tusharmath deleted the chore/add-mustache-tests branch April 23, 2024 05:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: chore Routine tasks like conversions, reorganization, and maintenance work. type: feature Brand new functionality, features, pages, workflows, endpoints, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants