Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(bridge-ui): add env values in the readme #11403

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2023

Conversation

wolfderechter
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfderechter wolfderechter commented Jan 6, 2023

add default env values in the readme.
#8198
The values come from here. I used them locally and I was able to do transactions with my own local bridge.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 6, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
website 🔄 Building (Inspect) Jan 6, 2023 at 11:29PM (UTC)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #11403 (d938d6c) into main (a8e82d5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11403   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.99%   65.99%           
=======================================
  Files         108      108           
  Lines        2929     2929           
  Branches      355      355           
=======================================
  Hits         1933     1933           
  Misses        919      919           
  Partials       77       77           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
bridge-ui 95.05% <ø> (ø)
protocol 57.76% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from a8e82d5
relayer 69.10% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from a8e82d5
ui 100.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from a8e82d5

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@wolfderechter
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc: @d1onys1us @shadab-taiko

@dantaik dantaik requested a review from shadab-taiko January 7, 2023 13:35
@dantaik
Copy link
Contributor

dantaik commented Jan 7, 2023

@shadab-taiko @d1onys1us Please also take a look at this.

@dantaik dantaik requested a review from dionysuzx January 7, 2023 13:36
@dionysuzx
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants