Conversation
- μ ν¨νμ§ μμ μ λ ¬ νλμ λν μμΈ μΆκ° - μ ν¨ν μ λ ¬ μ΅μ μ λν μμ μΆκ°
- μ λ ¬ μ΅μ
μ 쿼리 맀κ°λ³μλ‘ λ°μ μ λ ¬νλ λ‘μ§ μΆκ°
- μμ
λ³λ‘ μλΉμ€ λ©μλ λΆλ¦¬
- νν°λ§λ base query μμ±
- total κ° λ°ν
- μν λͺ©λ‘ λ°ν
- μ λ ¬ λ‘μ§ μ μ©
- νμ΄μ§λ€μ΄μ
μ μ©
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the product retrieval system by introducing sorting capabilities, allowing users to specify sorting criteria for product listings. Key changes include new parameters in service and controller methods, the introduction of a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ProductController
participant ProductService
participant ProductRepository
Client->>ProductController: Request products (sort_by, sort_direction)
ProductController->>ProductService: getProductsByFilterOptions(pageable, filterOptions, sortOptions)
ProductService->>ProductRepository: fetchProducts(baseQuery, pageable, sortOptions)
ProductRepository-->>ProductService: Return sorted products
ProductService-->>ProductController: Return paged response
ProductController-->>Client: Return product list
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductController.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/request/ProductSortOptionsDto.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/exception/InvalidSortOptionException.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductService.java (6 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/global/common/constants/ProductConstants.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/taco/klkl/global/error/exception/ErrorCode.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/resources/database/data.sql (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductControllerTest.java (5 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/integration/ProductIntegrationTest.java (8 hunks)
- src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductServiceTest.java (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (30)
src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/dto/request/ProductSortOptionsDto.java (1)
3-6: Appropriate use of Java record for DTO.The use of a Java record here is a good choice for defining a simple data transfer object with immutable fields. This enhances readability and maintainability.
src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/exception/InvalidSortOptionException.java (1)
6-9: Well-implemented custom exception.The
InvalidSortOptionExceptioncorrectly extends theCustomExceptionand uses a specific error code. This approach is clean and maintains consistency in exception handling.src/main/java/taco/klkl/global/common/constants/ProductConstants.java (1)
20-21: Addition of sorting constants is well-structured.The use of
Set.of()for definingALLOWED_SORT_BYandALLOWED_SORT_DIRECTIONis appropriate, ensuring immutability and clarity. These constants are well-named and support the new sorting feature effectively.Ensure these constants are utilized correctly throughout the codebase to validate sorting options.
Verification successful
Constants are correctly utilized for sorting validation.
The
ALLOWED_SORT_BYandALLOWED_SORT_DIRECTIONconstants are appropriately used inProductService.javato validate sorting options, ensuring only allowed values are used. This confirms their correct implementation and usage in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `ALLOWED_SORT_BY` and `ALLOWED_SORT_DIRECTION` constants. # Test: Search for the usage of these constants. Expect: Occurrences where sorting options are validated. rg --type java 'ALLOWED_SORT_BY|ALLOWED_SORT_DIRECTION'Length of output: 669
src/main/java/taco/klkl/global/error/exception/ErrorCode.java (1)
24-26: Additions look good. Verify usage ofINVALID_SORT_OPTION.The addition of
INVALID_SORT_OPTIONenhances error handling for sorting. Ensure that this new error code is used appropriately in the application logic.Verification successful
Usage of
INVALID_SORT_OPTIONVerifiedThe
INVALID_SORT_OPTIONerror code is effectively used in the application logic through theInvalidSortOptionException, particularly within theProductServiceclass. This confirms proper integration for handling invalid sort options.
ProductService.java:validateSortOptionsmethod throwsInvalidSortOptionException.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new error code `INVALID_SORT_OPTION`. # Test: Search for the usage of `INVALID_SORT_OPTION`. Expect: Occurrences in the application logic. rg --type java 'INVALID_SORT_OPTION'Length of output: 294
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of `InvalidSortOptionException` in the codebase to verify integration of `INVALID_SORT_OPTION`. rg --type java 'InvalidSortOptionException'Length of output: 845
src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductController.java (4)
26-26: Import addition is appropriate.The import of
ProductSortOptionsDtois necessary for handling sorting options.
48-49: New sorting parameters are well-defined.The addition of
sort_byandsort_directionparameters with default values enhances the flexibility of product sorting.
56-60: Construction ofProductSortOptionsDtois correct.The creation of
ProductSortOptionsDtowith the sorting parameters is well-implemented.
60-60: Ensure integration with the service layer.The
getProductsByFilterOptionsmethod now includes sorting options. Verify that the service layer correctly handles these options.Verification successful
Integration with the service layer is correctly implemented.
The
getProductsByFilterOptionsmethod inProductService.javavalidates and utilizesProductSortOptionsDto, confirming that sorting options are handled appropriately in the service layer.
ProductService.java:
- Line 74:
validateSortOptions(sortOptions);- Line 79:
fetchProducts(baseQuery, pageable, sortOptions);Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of sorting options in the service layer. # Test: Search for the `getProductsByFilterOptions` method and check for handling of `ProductSortOptionsDto`. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'public $_ getProductsByFilterOptions($_, $_, ProductSortOptionsDto sortOptions) { $$$ }'Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `getProductsByFilterOptions` method in the codebase without specifying parameter types. # Test: Search for any occurrence of the `getProductsByFilterOptions` method. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'public $_ getProductsByFilterOptions($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1733
src/main/resources/database/data.sql (1)
132-136: Inclusion oflike_countis consistent with new features.The addition of the
like_countcolumn in theProducttable aligns with the sorting feature requirements.src/main/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductService.java (6)
75-75: LGTM! Validate sort options before use.The addition of
validateSortOptionsensures that only allowed sort options are used, which is a good practice.
122-139: LGTM! The query construction is well-structured.The use of helper methods for creating specific filters improves readability and maintainability.
147-159: LGTM! The product fetching logic is clear and effective.The encapsulation of sorting and pagination logic within this method is well-done, promoting separation of concerns.
162-170: LGTM! Sorting logic is correctly applied.The use of
OrderSpecifierto apply sorting based on direction and field is appropriate and flexible.
261-268: LGTM! Sort options validation is robust.The method effectively ensures that only allowed sort options are used, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.
70-79: Ensure correct usage ofsortOptionsacross the codebase.The addition of
ProductSortOptionsDto sortOptionsto the method signature is a significant change. Ensure all calls togetProductsByFilterOptionsare updated to include this new parameter.Verification successful
All calls to
getProductsByFilterOptionsare correctly updated withsortOptions.The integration of the
ProductSortOptionsDto sortOptionsparameter in thegetProductsByFilterOptionsmethod has been consistently applied across the codebase. This includes updates in theProductController,ProductServiceTest, andProductControllerTestfiles.
ProductController.java: Method call correctly includessortOptions.ProductServiceTest.java: Test cases includesortOptions.ProductControllerTest.java: Mocking and verification includesortOptions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getProductsByFilterOptions` include the new `sortOptions` parameter. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type java -A 5 $'getProductsByFilterOptions'Length of output: 3309
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductServiceTest.java (1)
163-194: LGTM! Sorting functionality is well-tested.The test effectively validates that products can be retrieved with the specified sorting options. Ensure that test coverage includes all possible sorting scenarios.
Verification successful
Comprehensive Test Coverage for Sorting Scenarios
The test coverage for sorting scenarios using
ProductSortOptionsDtois comprehensive across both service and controller layers. Ensure that all possible sorting criteria and directions are tested to maintain robust functionality.
- Files Involved:
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/service/ProductServiceTest.javasrc/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductControllerTest.javaScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for all sorting scenarios. # Test: Search for test cases involving `ProductSortOptionsDto`. Expect: Comprehensive coverage of sorting scenarios. rg --type java -A 5 $'ProductSortOptionsDto'Length of output: 9956
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/controller/ProductControllerTest.java (1)
Line range hint
136-194:
LGTM! Controller sorting logic is well-tested.The test ensures that sorting parameters are correctly handled by the controller. Verify that all sorting scenarios are covered in the tests.
src/test/java/taco/klkl/domain/product/integration/ProductIntegrationTest.java (13)
209-210: LGTM! Sorting parameters added correctly.The addition of sorting parameters
sort_byandsort_directionis consistent with the feature objectives.
269-270: LGTM! Sorting parameters added correctly.The addition of sorting parameters
sort_byandsort_directionis consistent with the feature objectives.
343-344: LGTM! Sorting parameters added correctly.The addition of sorting parameters
sort_byandsort_directionis consistent with the feature objectives.
416-417: LGTM! Sorting parameters added correctly.The addition of sorting parameters
sort_byandsort_directionis consistent with the feature objectives.
490-491: LGTM! Sorting parameters added correctly.The addition of sorting parameters
sort_byandsort_directionis consistent with the feature objectives.
563-564: LGTM! Sorting parameters added correctly.The addition of sorting parameters
sort_byandsort_directionis consistent with the feature objectives.
581-654: LGTM! New test for sorting by creation date in ascending order.The test method is well-structured and effectively validates the sorting functionality.
656-729: LGTM! New test for sorting by creation date in descending order.The test method is well-structured and effectively validates the sorting functionality.
731-804: LGTM! New test for sorting by rating in ascending order.The test method is well-structured and effectively validates the sorting functionality.
806-879: LGTM! New test for sorting by rating in descending order.The test method is well-structured and effectively validates the sorting functionality.
881-902: LGTM! New test for sorting by like count in ascending order.The test method is well-structured and effectively validates the sorting functionality.
904-925: LGTM! New test for sorting by like count in descending order.The test method is well-structured and effectively validates the sorting functionality.
154-159: Verify data setup consistency for pagination test.The expected number of products has been increased from 4 to 5. Ensure that the data setup reflects this change consistently across all related tests.
ohhamma
merged commit ea07b33
into
KL-71/μν-λͺ©λ‘-μ‘°ν-api-ꡬν
π μ°κ΄λ μ΄μ
π μμ λ΄μ©
π³ μμ λΈλμΉλͺ
KL-94/μν-μ λ ¬-κΈ°λ₯πΈ μ€ν¬λ¦°μ· (μ ν)
π¬ 리뷰 μꡬμ¬ν (μ ν)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
like_count, for products, providing additional insight into user engagement.Bug Fixes
Tests