Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrected the line references for the basic controller example #6016

Conversation

UbiquitousBear
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Doc fix? yes
New docs? no
Applies to 2.8+
Fixed tickets n/a

Corrected the line references for the basic controller example; added a reference to separate use statement from initial namespacing explanation.

… a reference to separate use statement from initial namespacing explanation.
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Dec 15, 2015

👍

@wouterj
Copy link
Member

wouterj commented Dec 17, 2015

Great! Thanks Shamil for catching & fixing this little mistake.

wouterj added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
…ample (theTeddyBear)

This PR was submitted for the 2.8 branch but it was merged into the 2.3 branch instead (closes #6016).

Discussion
----------

Corrected the line references for the basic controller example

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Doc fix?          | yes
| New docs?     |no
| Applies to    | 2.8+
| Fixed tickets | n/a

Corrected the line references for the basic controller example; added a reference to separate use statement from initial namespacing explanation.

Commits
-------

82a1808 Corrected the line references for the basic controller example; added a reference to separate use statement from initial namespacing explanation.
@wouterj wouterj closed this Dec 17, 2015
@wouterj
Copy link
Member

wouterj commented Dec 17, 2015

Btw, the reason behind the closed instead of merged status of this PR is because I patched this into the 2.3 version of the docs. I'll take care of bringing this fix to the other versions as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants