minor #3898 clarifying the need of a factory for auth-provider (leber…

…knecht)

This PR was submitted for the 2.4 branch but it was merged into the 2.3 branch instead (closes #3898).

Discussion
----------

clarifying the need of a factory for auth-provider

I think the documentation is a little bit unclear here. It doesnt actually explain why we dont simply expose the provider via "normal" service definition, but instead doing it in a compiler pass.

Commits
-------

bd3e5f3 clarifying the need of a factory for auth-provider

cookbook/security/custom_authentication_provider.rst

@@ -287,8 +287,8 @@ The Factory
 -----------
 
 You have created a custom token, custom listener, and custom provider. Now
-you need to tie them all together. How do you make your provider available
-to your security configuration? The answer is by using a *factory*. A factory
+you need to tie them all together. How do you make a unique provider available
+for every firewall? The answer is by using a *factory*. A factory
 is where you hook into the Security component, telling it the name of your
 provider and any configuration options available for it. First, you must
 create a class which implements