Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: bump golangci-lint to v1.61 #386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tri-adam
Copy link
Member

Remove some nolint comments that are no longer necessary due to improvements in the gosec linter. Improve alignment overflow check logic.

Remove some nolint comments that are no longer necessary due to
improvements in the gosec linter. Improve alignment overflow check
logic.
@tri-adam tri-adam self-assigned this Sep 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.39%. Comparing base (a270847) to head (0d09c53).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #386      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.41%   65.39%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          37       37              
  Lines        3264     3263       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         2135     2134       -1     
  Misses        975      975              
  Partials      154      154              
Flag Coverage Δ
65.39% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tri-adam tri-adam marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2024 17:53
@tri-adam tri-adam merged commit d08b6c1 into sylabs:main Sep 27, 2024
1 check passed
@tri-adam tri-adam deleted the golangci-lint-v1.61 branch September 27, 2024 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants