-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(reports): display ahead indicator in yearly reports stats #2770
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple components. Notably, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/features/ministry/service_year/monthly_stats/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx (1)
26-30
: LGTM! Consider removing the empty line for consistency.The implementation correctly determines if a month is ahead of the current month. The
useMemo
optimization is appropriate here since the computation depends on external data.const isAhead = useMemo(() => { const current = currentMonthServiceYear(); - return month > current; }, [month]);
src/components/badge/index.types.ts (2)
64-65
: Add JSDoc documentation for thefaded
property.To maintain consistency with other properties, please add JSDoc documentation explaining the purpose and usage of the
faded
property.+ /** + * Indicates whether the badge should be displayed in a faded state. + */ faded?: boolean
64-65
: Consider reordering properties alphabetically.To maintain consistency, consider moving the
faded
property betweenfilled
andfullWidth
properties.filled?: boolean; + /** + * Indicates whether the badge should be displayed in a faded state. + */ + faded?: boolean; + /** * Indicates whether the badge should occupy full width. */ fullWidth?: boolean; - - faded?: booleansrc/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
63-67
: Consider reusing the shouldShowStatus conditionThe logic is correct, but for consistency, this could use the same extracted condition suggested earlier.
- {!isCurrent && !isAhead && comments.length > 0 && ( + {shouldShowStatus && comments.length > 0 && ( <Typography className="body-small-regular" color="var(--grey-350)"> {comments} </Typography> )}src/features/ministry/service_year/monthly_stats/month_item/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
68-96
: Consider simplifying conditional rendering logicThe current implementation has multiple nested conditions that could be simplified for better maintainability.
Consider extracting the badge rendering logic into separate components or methods:
const CommentsSection = ({ isAhead, isCurrent, comments }: Props) => { if (isCurrent || isAhead || !comments.length) return null; return ( <Typography className="body-small-regular" color="var(--grey-350)"> {comments} </Typography> ); }; const StatusBadge = ({ isAhead, isCurrent }: Props) => { if (isCurrent) { return <Badge {...currentBadgeProps} text={t('tr_inProgress')} />; } if (isAhead) { return <Badge {...aheadBadgeProps} text={t('tr_ahead')} faded />; } return null; };This would make the main component more readable and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
97-120
: Simplify stats badges rendering logicThe repeated condition and nested structure could be simplified for better maintainability.
Consider extracting the stats badges into a separate component:
const StatsBadges = ({ isCurrent, isAhead, bible_studies, total_hours }: Props) => { if (isCurrent || isAhead) return null; return ( <> {bible_studies > 0 && ( <Badge {...badgeProps} text={t('tr_bibleStudiesCount', { StudiesCount: bible_studies })} /> )} {total_hours > 0 && ( <Badge {...badgeProps} text={t('tr_hoursList', { Hours: total_hours })} /> )} </> ); };This would:
- Eliminate the repeated condition
- Make the rendering logic more explicit
- Improve component testability
src/utils/date.ts (1)
195-197
: Consider adding unit tests for edge cases.The month range calculation is critical for determining which months are "ahead". Consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior for edge cases:
- First month of service year (September)
- Last month of service year (August)
- Transition months around September
Would you like me to help generate comprehensive unit tests for these scenarios?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- src/components/badge/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/badge/index.types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/features/ministry/service_year/monthly_stats/month_item/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/features/ministry/service_year/monthly_stats/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/features/ministry/service_year/yearly_stats/hours_stats/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/utils/date.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/features/ministry/service_year/yearly_stats/hours_stats/index.tsx (1)
44-44
: LGTM! Verify translation key exists.The typo fix in the translation key is correct.
Let's verify the translation key exists:
✅ Verification successful
Translation key verified and properly defined across all locales ✅
The translation key
tr_averageMonthlyHours
is correctly defined in all language files undersrc/locales/*/ministry.json
. The key exists in 31 different locale files with appropriate translations, ensuring no runtime issues will occur.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the translation key exists in translation files # Expected: Find occurrences of the translation key in language files # Search for the translation key in all files rg "tr_averageMonthlyHours"Length of output: 2660
src/features/ministry/service_year/monthly_stats/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx (2)
59-59
: LGTM!The
isAhead
property is correctly exposed in the return object, maintaining consistency with other boolean flags.
26-30
: Verify TypeScript types and component usage.Let's ensure all components using this hook are updated to handle the new
isAhead
property.Also applies to: 59-59
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the type definitions and usage patterns more thoroughly.
This will help us verify if all variants of the hook are consistent in their implementation and type definitions.
Let me fix the regex patterns and try again.
Based on the comprehensive results, I can now generate the final response.
No issues with
isAhead
property implementationThe verification shows that:
- The
isAhead
property is consistently implemented across all components using it- Components using this property properly handle it in their rendering logic
- Type definitions and hook implementations are consistent
Key findings:
- The property is used in both publisher records and ministry service year components
- Components using
isAhead
have proper conditional rendering based on its value- The implementation is consistent with the codebase's patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if components using useMonthItem are properly typed and handle the new property # Test 1: Find all files importing useMonthItem echo "Files importing useMonthItem:" rg -l "useMonthItem" # Test 2: Check if MonthItemProps type is updated echo -e "\nMonthItemProps type definition:" rg -A 5 "MonthItemProps.*=.*{" "src/features/ministry" # Test 3: Find usages of isAhead in components echo -e "\nUsages of isAhead property:" rg "isAhead" "src/features"Length of output: 2895
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the type definitions and hook implementations across all variants # Check type definitions in all MonthItem related files echo "Type definitions in MonthItem files:" rg -A 3 "type\s+\w*Props\s*=|interface\s+\w*Props\s*{" "src/features/*/*/month_item/" # Check all useMonthItem hook implementations echo -e "\nAll useMonthItem hook implementations:" rg -A 10 "const useMonthItem = " "src/features/*/*/month_item/" # Check return types of useMonthItem hooks echo -e "\nReturn types of useMonthItem:" rg -A 3 "return\s+{" "src/features/*/*/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx"Length of output: 779
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the type definitions and hook implementations across all variants # Check type definitions in all MonthItem related files echo "Type definitions in MonthItem files:" rg -A 3 "(type|interface)\s+\w+Props" "src/features" # Check all useMonthItem hook implementations echo -e "\nAll useMonthItem hook implementations:" fd useMonthItem.tsx | xargs cat # Check return statements in useMonthItem hooks echo -e "\nReturn statements in useMonthItem hooks:" fd useMonthItem.tsx | xargs rg -A 2 "return \{"Length of output: 53375
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx (1)
81-81
: LGTM!Clean addition of the
isAhead
property to the return object.src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/index.tsx (3)
22-22
: LGTM: Clean addition of isAhead propertyThe new property is properly destructured from the hook's return value.
45-50
: LGTM: Clear visual distinction for future monthsThe conditional styling effectively differentiates future months using the grey color.
81-90
: Verify translation key existsThe badge implementation looks good, but let's ensure the translation key 'tr_ahead' exists.
✅ Verification successful
The verification is complete and I can generate the final response since the shell script output shows comprehensive evidence about the translation key's existence.
Translation key 'tr_ahead' is properly defined
The translation key is well-defined across multiple language files in the
ministry.json
files, with appropriate translations for various locales (e.g., "Ahead" in English, "提前" in Chinese, "Voraus" in German). The key is also consistently used in two relevant components:
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/index.tsx
src/features/ministry/service_year/monthly_stats/month_item/index.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the translation key in the codebase rg "tr_ahead" -g '*.{json,ts,tsx}'Length of output: 1995
src/features/ministry/service_year/monthly_stats/month_item/index.tsx (1)
23-23
: LGTM: Clean hook integrationThe
isAhead
property is well-integrated into the component's destructuring pattern.src/components/badge/index.tsx (3)
74-74
: LGTM: Clean prop additionThe
faded
prop is properly integrated into the component's props structure.
109-112
: Consider handling faded state for filled grey badgesWhile the faded state is properly handled for non-filled grey badges, there's no special handling for filled grey badges. Should filled grey badges also have a faded state?
Let's check if filled+faded combination is used in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Look for Badge usage with both filled and faded props ast-grep --pattern 'Badge $props={$_} filled={true} faded={true}'
82-85
: LGTM: Consistent color handlingThe faded state logic is properly implemented, using appropriate color scale values from the design system.
Let's verify the color variables are defined:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the color variables.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Color variables are properly defined and used consistently
The search results confirm that both
--grey-300
and--grey-400
CSS variables are well-defined in the global styles (src/global/global.css
) and design tokens (converter/css/tokens.json
). These variables are widely used throughout the application, indicating they are part of the established design system.The faded state implementation using
var(--${color}-300)
is consistent with the codebase's color scale pattern, where:
- The base colors use
400
shade- The lighter/faded variants use
300
shade🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the grey-300 and grey-400 color variables are defined in the theme rg --type css "grey-(300|400)"Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for color variable definitions in common theme/style files fd -e css -e scss -e less -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg --type-add 'style:*.{css,scss,less,ts,tsx}' --type style '(--grey-300|--grey-400|grey-300|grey-400)' # Also check for any color-related configuration files fd -e js -e ts -e json | xargs rg 'colors?' -l | xargs rg 'grey'Length of output: 28418
src/utils/date.ts (2)
195-197
: LGTM! Fixed critical issues in month range calculation.The changes fix two important issues:
- Prevents negative indices for early months in the service year
- Ensures the month range stays within valid bounds (1-13)
This makes the month range calculation more robust and aligns with the ahead indicator functionality.
195-197
: Verify the usage of buildServiceYearsList.Let's verify where this function is used to ensure the changes don't have unintended side effects.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage context by examining the files that use
buildServiceYearsList
.
Let me generate one more verification to understand the complete context of the month calculation logic:
Based on the comprehensive context gathered, I can now provide a final response:
The month calculation changes are safe and mathematically correct
The changes to
maxIndex
calculation inbuildServiceYearsList
are part of a well-structured service year logic that:
- Correctly handles the service year transition at month 9 (September)
- Properly limits the maximum number of months to 13
- Is used consistently across multiple components for service year/month selection
- The formula
currentMonth < 9 ? currentMonth + 7 : currentMonth - 5
ensures:
- For months before September (< 9): Adds remaining months of the service year
- For months after September (≥ 9): Calculates months since the start of service year
The changes maintain the expected behavior and are used safely in:
- Service year month selectors
- Monthly history components
- Publisher records
- Field service statistics
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of buildServiceYearsList echo "Searching for direct usage of buildServiceYearsList..." rg "buildServiceYearsList" -l # Search for components that might be affected by the month calculations echo -e "\nSearching for MonthItem components that might use this data..." rg "MonthItem" --type typescriptLength of output: 1364
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the context of buildServiceYearsList usage in a few key files echo "Checking usage in useMonthSelector.tsx..." rg -A 5 "buildServiceYearsList" src/features/reports/service_year_month_selector/month_selector/useMonthSelector.tsx echo -e "\nChecking usage in useYearSelector.tsx..." rg -A 5 "buildServiceYearsList" src/features/reports/service_year_month_selector/year_selector/useYearSelector.tsx echo -e "\nChecking the implementation in date.ts..." rg -A 10 "buildServiceYearsList" src/utils/date.ts # Let's also check for any month-related calculations or validations echo -e "\nChecking for month-related validations..." rg "maxIndex|currentMonth" src/utils/date.tsLength of output: 2479
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the complete function where maxIndex is used echo "Checking the complete function context..." ast-grep --pattern 'export const buildServiceYearsList = () => { $$$ }' # Also check for any tests related to this functionality echo -e "\nChecking for related tests..." rg -l "buildServiceYearsList" --glob "**/*.test.ts" --glob "**/*.spec.ts"Length of output: 3105
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
organized-app Run #1439
Run Properties:
|
Project |
organized-app
|
Branch Review |
main
|
Run status |
Passed #1439
|
Run duration | 00m 13s |
Commit |
1297eb3fa6: fix(reports): display ahead indicator in yearly reports stats
|
Committer | rhahao.vj |
View all properties for this run ↗︎ |
Test results | |
---|---|
Failures |
0
|
Flaky |
0
|
Pending |
0
|
Skipped |
0
|
Passing |
1
|
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ |
No description provided.