Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: generic arrays generate successfully #1247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2022
Merged

Conversation

pdylanross
Copy link
Contributor

@pdylanross pdylanross commented Jun 30, 2022

Describe the PR
Fixed generic nested array generation.

Relation issue
#1246

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1247 (327ea07) into master (1cd0b53) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1247   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.98%   94.99%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        2614     2618    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits         2483     2487    +4     
  Misses         72       72           
  Partials       59       59           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
generics.go 94.02% <100.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1cd0b53...327ea07. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@ubogdan ubogdan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ubogdan ubogdan merged commit 8de9952 into swaggo:master Jun 30, 2022
@ubogdan
Copy link
Contributor

ubogdan commented Jun 30, 2022

@pdylanross Thanks for your contribution

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants