Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

go: Add convenient construction of rawPayload messages #1538

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

svix-jplatte
Copy link
Member

@svix-jplatte svix-jplatte marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2024 17:05
@svix-jplatte svix-jplatte requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2024 17:05
go/message.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go/message.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@svix-jplatte svix-jplatte merged commit b095fdc into main Dec 4, 2024
3 checks passed
@svix-jplatte svix-jplatte deleted the jplatte/go-msg-create-raw-payload branch December 4, 2024 13:23
@svix-jplatte svix-jplatte mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2024
svix-jplatte added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
## What's changed

* Libs/Go: Add convenient construction of messages with pre-serialized
payload ([#1538])
* Libs/Go: Reduce the use of `NullableX` types to where they actually
have a use ([#1543])
* Libs/JavaScript: Add convenient construction of messages with
pre-serialized payload ([#1539])
* Libs/Java: Add convenient construction of messages with pre-serialized
payload ([#1544])
* Libs/C#: Bump .NET target to 8.0 ([#1546])
* Libs/C#: Add convenient construction of messages with pre-serialized
payload ([#1545])
* Libs/Python: Add convenient construction of messages with
pre-serialized payload ([#1540])
* Libs/Ruby: Add convenient construction of messages with pre-serialized
payload ([#1541])
* Libs/JavaScript: Compile svix package for ESM and CommonJS, reducing
bundle sizes ([#1549])

[#1538]: #1538
[#1543]: #1543
[#1539]: #1539
[#1540]: #1540
[#1541]: #1541
[#1544]: #1544
[#1545]: #1545
[#1546]: #1546
[#1549]: #1549
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants