Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated for Pharo 7 64-bit with Metacello baseline support #4

Open
wants to merge 49 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jvalteren
Copy link

Added minor improvements, like LimitRTPRIO in systemd script.

Jonathan van Alteren and others added 17 commits June 10, 2019 17:04
Logging using Linux output redirect instead of NeoConsole log.
Added creation of a more extensive deploy script to end of build script.
Removed support for init.d in scaffold script.
Updated and cleaned up scaffold script.
@svenvc
Copy link
Owner

svenvc commented Nov 29, 2019

Hi Jonathan,

I haven't forgotten about this.

During the last couple of weeks I started using a new scheme to install/build/deploy pharo server code and I am quite happy with it. I tried to simplify things. I no longer use scaffolding, but a run subdirectory for each service.

I put a simpler version online. Please have a look and tell me what you think.

https://github.com/svenvc/minimal-pharo-server-tools

In my real production code, these scripts are integrated in the main code base and include private key usage.

Sven

@jvalteren
Copy link
Author

Hi Sven,

Thanks for getting back on this. We've been happily using our modified version of the server tools over the last months. But, I'm already feeling a desire to apply more CI/CD principles to our workflow, so we're bound to extend the functionality at some point.

I'll take a look at your new minimal Pharo server tools soon, thanks. First I've got to finish our project milestone this week ;-) So I'll get back to you somewhere next week (I hope).

Cheers,
Jonathan

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants