Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline variable that's used only once #5909

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

pushkine
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@benmccann benmccann changed the title Remove unused variable Inline variable that's used only once Jan 20, 2021
@Conduitry Conduitry merged commit eeeeb49 into sveltejs:master Jan 29, 2021
hontas added a commit to hontas/svelte that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2021
* 'master' of https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte: (129 commits)
  -> v3.32.3
  fix remove of lone :host selectors (sveltejs#5984)
  -> v3.32.2
  update changelog
  fix extra invalidation with component prop binding to object property (sveltejs#5890)
  update css-tree@^1.1.2 (sveltejs#5958)
  fix :host and :global css scoping (sveltejs#5957)
  Tutorial : a better explanation of component events (sveltejs#4639)
  "What's new in Svelte" February newsletter (sveltejs#5925)
  Change color on 404 page (sveltejs#5932)
  -> v3.32.1
  warn module variables are nonreactive and make them truly nonreactive (sveltejs#5847)
  update changelog
  fix: "foreign" namespace elements should still allow binding 'this' (sveltejs#5942)
  inline `prop_values` in `init` helper (sveltejs#5909)
  update changelog
  don't create class update functions when dependencies aren't reactive (sveltejs#5926)
  fix extraneous store subscription in SSR (sveltejs#5929)
  make `SvelteComponentDev` typings more forgiving (sveltejs#5937)
  make animation/transition params optional (sveltejs#5936)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants