fix: allow global next to & for nesting

[paoloricciuti]

Svelte 5 rewrite

Closes #11782

Please note that the Svelte codebase is currently being rewritten for Svelte 5. Changes should target Svelte 5, which lives on the default branch (main).

If your PR concerns Svelte 4 (including updates to svelte.dev.docs), please ensure the base branch is svelte-4 and not main.

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
• Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
• This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
• Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests and linting

• Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a8970eb

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
svelte	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[paoloricciuti]

I just realized maybe it's possible to move

svelte/packages/svelte/src/compiler/phases/3-transform/css/index.js

Lines 260 to 264 in 537ea54

	for (const selector of relative_selector.selectors) {
	if (selector.type === 'PseudoClassSelector' && selector.name === 'global') {
	remove_global_pseudo_class(selector);
	}
	}

Before the if instead of duplicating the code inside the if before the continue

[paoloricciuti]

I just realized maybe it's possible to move

svelte/packages/svelte/src/compiler/phases/3-transform/css/index.js

Lines 260 to 264 in 537ea54

	for (const selector of relative_selector.selectors) {
	if (selector.type === 'PseudoClassSelector' && selector.name === 'global') {
	remove_global_pseudo_class(selector);
	}
	}

Before the if instead of duplicating the code inside the if before the continue

It seems i was right...better imho

[dummdidumm]

Can we have another test case (within this test, doesn't need to be another one) for <div><p class="class">foo</p></div> to check that class isn't scoped in the HTML?

[paoloricciuti]

Sure...but actually it needs to be a bit different i think because this cover the case for

div{
    &.class{
    }
}

which is where the class is attached to the div.

[paoloricciuti]

Added now!

[dummdidumm]

You're right, doh - thanks!

[paoloricciuti]

It tripped me too when i was testing if my change broke something else 😄

[dummdidumm]

You're right, doh - thanks!