-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nested async components error when switching components #3448
Comments
I have the same issue using sveltestrap (bootstrap4) components which are imported. In this case <Dropdown inNavbar=true {isOpen} toggle={() => (isOpen = !isOpen)}>
<DropdownMenu >
{#each areas as area}
<DropdownItem>{area.az_name}</DropdownItem>
{/each}
</DropdownMenu>
</Dropdown> The first time it loads fine and the dropdown list is loaded properly any next update fails. index.mjs:649 Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read property 'c' of undefined
at is (index.mjs:649)
at Object.o (DropdownItem.svelte:52)
at transition_out (index.mjs:684)
at Object.o (App.svelte:60)
at transition_out (index.mjs:684)
at out (App.svelte:59)
at Object.p (App.svelte:59)
at Object.p (DropdownMenu.svelte:26)
at ls (index.mjs:604)
at es (index.mjs:578) Debugging with source map it leads to here: function transition_out(block, local, detach, callback) {
if (block && block.o) {
if (outroing.has(block))
return;
outroing.add(block);
//! outros is undefined below
outros.c.push(() => {
outroing.delete(block);
if (callback) {
if (detach)
block.d(1);
callback();
}
});
block.o(local);
}
} |
Simply adding guards before the |
Found similar (same?) bug while using https://github.com/c0bra/svelma |
I'm not using anything async and I'm getting this error. I wrote this patch: diff --git a/src/runtime/internal/transitions.ts b/src/runtime/internal/transitions.ts
index ed23d3c1..7098afbd 100644
--- a/src/runtime/internal/transitions.ts
+++ b/src/runtime/internal/transitions.ts
@@ -53,13 +53,15 @@ export function transition_out(block, local: 0 | 1, detach: 0 | 1, callback) {
if (outroing.has(block)) return;
outroing.add(block);
- outros.c.push(() => {
- outroing.delete(block);
- if (callback) {
- if (detach) block.d(1);
- callback();
- }
- });
+ if (outros !== undefined) {
+ outros.c.push(() => {
+ outroing.delete(block);
+ if (callback) {
+ if (detach) block.d(1);
+ callback();
+ }
+ });
+ }
block.o(local);
} Before accessing Alternative solutions:
Both create the If someone in the know wants to chime in with the appropriate solution. I will create the PR. |
I'm having the same problem as well, but using the patch from @tcrowe fixes everything. Until a fix is accepted for this I'm patching |
It's really critical... I can't use the components of svemla as overlays because of this error. |
same/similar issue can be seen on link: child component: the onDestroy doesn't get called. just get the
pointing to my each loop there are no transitions |
does anyone have a solution to this? |
If I understand what everyone here means by "dynamic components" as "components built from a separate Svelte project, of which the final JS file is dynamically loaded" then the reason for these errors is because Svelte bundles with its own copy of the runtime internals (or rather, by default that's what bundlers do with Svelte). I'm making this assumption because otherwise you would just download the Unfortunately if this is the case then any suggested fixes relating to guards etc. only half-fix the problem because there are still incorrect state tracking variables lying around which could cause more problems later on, even if no errors are thrown. The runtime internals use module level variables to track state, so when a component from one project calls a component from another project and both use their own copies of the internals things start going wrong due to the state tracking variables not being shared. I started an issue specifically about this here: #3671 In the end @halfnelson came up with a solution where the pre-built component should declare at least the You can see that comment and my comment afterwards stating what I did here: #3671 (comment) If this is the problem that's being discussed here then it would seem that projects distributing pre-built Svelte components should set their bundles to be built expecting at least the In the case where they want both the option to be imported into an existing Svelte project or be used as a standalone component in a non-svelte project (in this case they would need their own internals) then they could set up the build to use globals if they exist or their own copy if they don't exist. I haven't looked into how to go about doing that myself though. If that's not possible then a project distributing pre-built Svelte components could provide two builds quite easily; one that contains a copy of the internals and one that expects them to be available somewhere in the environment, like as a global. The one that expects the internals to be available somewhere in the environment is the one that would be used inside a Svelte component built as a separate project. The only downside to this is that if the components were built using different versions of Svelte then it's possible that the expected functionality of each component will go out of sync due to API changes. This is one of the trade offs you have to make when you decide to include a pre-built component into your project anyway though. |
Thanks for the thorough reply. To clarify, in my comment, by dynamic component I meant that I'm using a condition to determine whether to render/mount component. Also I've tried using a local (uncompiled) and a svelte file from npm. The error happens in both cases. I believe, if I understand the comment and the referenced issue correctly, that should only be the case for the compiled component. So I don't think this solution would work for me. |
@dasDaniel I just downloaded your SvelteTable project and had a go with the Your example project is also bundling two different copies of the Svelte internals, so it's the same problem, but the source of the problem is different. That's why the error states that I don't know Rollup so I can't help you out with why it's happening, but if you copy the An easy test to see if two components are using the same internals or not is to use the context API. In the parent component set any random key value pair. If the parent and child are using the same internals then you should be able to retrieve your value in the child using |
thanks @jakelucas OK, so when I was testing it, I was toggling the way the component is included (relative vs package) I got the same error with both. I got the same error because I used 🤦♂×💯Now after using |
I'm running Svelte in a Meteor app, which imports a single component from a local npm package that contains a bunch of Svelte components. Whenever that component is used on a route, and I navigate away from that route, I get the same error: Stack
The component in question uses another component internally from the same package. If I remove the sub-component, the error goes away: <script>
// mypackage/src/TextField/TextField.svelte
import Field from '../Field/Field.svelte'; // <-- Remove this line and errors go away
export let label;
export let value;
</script>
<Field {label}> <!-- Remove this line and errors go away -->
<input bind:value/>
</Field> <!-- Remove this line and errors go away --> |
This happens also with |
This is definitely a bug. Here is how I ended up having this problem.
I use svelte 3.0.0 and bundle with rollup.
And here is an Engine app. Notice condition is part of an error scenario.
Here is how they meet: <!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Car App</title>
<link href="bundle.css" rel="stylesheet" />
</head>
<body>
<div id="parking-lot"></div>
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
<script src="Engine/bundle.js"></script>
<script>
new Car({
target: document.querySelector('#parking-lot'),
props: {
engine: Engine
}
})
</script>
</body>
</html> This time I get an error TypeError: (void 0) is undefined But same structural configuration caused TypeError: Cannot read property 'c' of undefined error in other app I'm building. |
@tcrowe could you create a PR with your patch? It's so frustrating to be blocked by this issue even if the solutions seems to be there. (downgrading to |
seeing the issue using a compiled component at https://svelte.dev/repl/3be030068a4646fc9c0ce71296cc9c48?version=3.23.0 added repo with error: https://github.com/dasDaniel/svelte-listbox |
Thanks for the example @dasDaniel, hope it gives a better idea of what happens. @retog delete the entire node__modules, force fixed version 3.20.1 and get rid of any .lock file before install all again. I wish I could know which is the specific trigger that breaks this because there are other fixes that I want to get from the updates of Svelte and I can't. |
@Egnus I did everything as you recommended, there's no version other than [email protected] in node_modules, still ending up with |
Hey guys, any update on that? I'm experiencing the same problem with simple components in an if-else block. |
@maykefreitas can help provide a repro for more context of what's happening for your case? |
Describe the bug
When nesting dynamic components that are imported via
await import('/SomeComponent.js')
, when the top-most component class is changed, the following error is thrown.Logs
TypeError: undefined is not an object (evaluating 'outros.c')
(full traceback below)
To Reproduce
I was unable to reproduce this in the REPL (I assume it doesn't support dynamic imports), so here is a repro repository: https://github.com/taylorzane/svelte-async-import-repro
Just run
yarn build && yarn start
and then open up the webpage and attempt to click the button. It will switch the to-be-imported component fromChild1
toChild2
(both of which dynamically importSubChild
)Expected behavior
The component switch/transition should not throw an error.
Stacktraces
Stack trace
Information about your Svelte project:
Your browser and the version: Safari 12.1.2
Your operating system: macOS 10.14.6
Svelte version: v3.9.1
Rollup
Severity
Currently makes multi-page (sapper) svelte usage entirely unusable.
Additional context
Might be related to #3165, but seems slightly different (
outros
is definitely defined)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: