Using ruff for code formatting
#43
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Adding more exclusions and ignores.
|
I didn't realise, this PR fixes #36, too. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for submitting this pull request! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes.
What is the motivation?
Using
ruffto check code formatting.Type of Change
What does this change do?
ruffto the Poetrydev-dependencies.ruffto pre-commit.ruffselects include:What is your testing strategy?
Two main commands for
ruff:poetry run ruff check .and for automated fixing:
poetry run ruff --fix .Is this related to any issues?
#41 - This PR only implements the
ruffpart of this issue. A separate PR should be made formypy.Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?