Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Fixed typo in 'GetGitHubClient()' function name #2625

Conversation

ashtable
Copy link
Contributor

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

I fixed the typo in the name of utils.GetGitHubClient()
It's currently named utils.GetGtiHubClient()

What is the current behavior?

n/a

What is the new behavior?

n/a

Additional context

n/a

@ashtable ashtable requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2024 10:11
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10506121799

Details

  • 2 of 4 (50.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • 5 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 60.019%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
cmd/bootstrap.go 0 1 0.0%
internal/bootstrap/bootstrap.go 0 1 0.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
internal/gen/keys/keys.go 5 12.9%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10483127892: -0.03%
Covered Lines: 6362
Relevant Lines: 10600

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Contributor

@sweatybridge sweatybridge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@sweatybridge sweatybridge changed the title Fixed typo in 'GetGitHubClient()' function name chore: Fixed typo in 'GetGitHubClient()' function name Aug 22, 2024
@sweatybridge sweatybridge merged commit 1a58c8a into supabase:develop Aug 22, 2024
13 checks passed
@ashtable
Copy link
Contributor Author

ashtable commented Aug 22, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants