Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace CodePipeline Source trigger from GitHub to ECR #9

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 3, 2019

Conversation

jlsan92
Copy link
Contributor

@jlsan92 jlsan92 commented Dec 28, 2018

This PR changes how the CodePipeline is triggered. Before it was triggered by a new change pushed into a GitHub repo, which was not ideal since the module was strictly coupled to GitHub and also it was needed to specify a GitHub integration token with the first terraform apply (as described in the Basic example)

Now the trigger for new updates comes from the ECR when a new Docker image is published, so now this modules only cares about updates Docker images and users can delegate other CI/CD processes with a different service like Travis or CircleCI.

@jlsan92 jlsan92 self-assigned this Dec 28, 2018
Copy link
Member

@robertrossmann robertrossmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

w00t! ❤️

@jlsan92
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlsan92 commented Jan 2, 2019

Seems that ECR as Source is not yet supported at 100% 👎

hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#7012

I'm trying to make a workaround of this 🤓

@jlsan92 jlsan92 requested a review from robertrossmann January 2, 2019 17:10
Copy link
Member

@robertrossmann robertrossmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🍻

@jlsan92 jlsan92 merged commit 376ce4e into master Jan 3, 2019
@jlsan92 jlsan92 deleted the refactor/ecr-as-source branch January 3, 2019 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants