Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Additional Sample which breaks PortEx #6

Closed
drorwolmer opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Additional Sample which breaks PortEx #6

drorwolmer opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
@struppigel
Labels
bug

Comments

@drorwolmer
Copy link

This benign sample breaks PortEx

sha256: 44e5184ca90477851fa65c080aea343fdbc01b1e8379eeafb5583aeb83bbd304
Sample: http://www.filedropper.com/sample_24
Password: infected!

I am happy to do QA for this tool!
@drorwolmer
Copy link
Author

And here's another benign sample

sha256: d1255f503b09dab675b657b6b036ba1bab45c2856143ef7aa6ce8352abfea636
Sample: http://www.filedropper.com/d1255f503b09dab675b657b6b036ba1bab45c2856143ef7aa6ce8352abfea636

@struppigel
Copy link
Owner

Confirmed bug. Thank you for the report.

@struppigel struppigel added the bug label Feb 29, 2016
@struppigel struppigel self-assigned this Feb 29, 2016
struppigel added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2016
@struppigel
#6 version fix
9be0196
struppigel added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2016
@struppigel
#6 export ordinal table with negative entry number fixed.
eaf5a26
struppigel added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2016
@struppigel
#6 solved update for PortexAnalyzer
c2eac0b
@struppigel
Copy link
Owner

Issue solved. Next PortEx release will have the bugfix. PortexAnalyzer is updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@struppigel struppigel

Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@struppigel @drorwolmer