Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new properties to TransferReversal #765

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2019

Conversation

remi-stripe
Copy link
Contributor

@remi-stripe remi-stripe commented Jan 11, 2019

Add support for destination_payment_refund and source_refund on TransferReversal.

cc @stripe/api-libraries

NOT asking for review yet as those properties are not expandable and I want to make sure it's expected to avoid a future breaking change.

@remi-stripe
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @mickjermsurawong-stripe

Support `destination_payment_refund` and `source_refund`.
@remi-stripe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry Mick, wrong PR, assigning to @brandur-stripe instead

@mickjermsurawong-stripe
Copy link
Contributor

ah.. since I was already looking.. I can verify that the two fields are expandable resources for Refund!

@remi-stripe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, this was just added in the API and I released stripe-mock 0.43.0 for this, but stripe-go never explicitly tests this (because the deserialization of a resource is already well tested elsewhere)

@brandur-stripe
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM @remi-stripe!

I'll leave it to you to release unless you'd like me to.

@remi-stripe remi-stripe merged commit 9222499 into master Jan 25, 2019
@remi-stripe remi-stripe deleted the remi-add-connect-properties branch January 25, 2019 22:05
nadaismail-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
* updated sync record to use relative links to records

* Using ID reference for the URL

Co-authored-by: Mike Bianco <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants