-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support source sharing via Stripe Connect #500
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do know if the
*
is required here? If we just need it forAppendToAsSourceOrExternalAccount
, it might be worth changing to-
to indicate that it's never needed elsewhere.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@brahn-stripe with
-
the field seems ignored. Not sure if I'm making another mistake but it's not sent to stripe-mock in that caseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry that was for @brandur-stripe
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah okay, this was more of a question I guess. If you look at
BankAccountParams
, it's basically serialized in two separate ways:bankaccount
ortoken
operations, the defaultform
implementation is used.AppendToAsSourceOrExternalAccount
function.I just want to make sure that we're implementing the minimal logic that we need so that we don't make this anymore complicated. If we need the new
ID
field for just (1) above, then we should remove the changes inAppendToAsSourceOrExternalAccount
. If we need it for just (2) (I don't think this is the case because you implemented a new test fortoken
), then we should have justform:"-"
to indicate that this field is never needed byform
. If we needID
to be encoded for both (1) and (2), then we should leave this as is.Can you just confirm that the latter is the case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@brandur-stripe My understanding was that we call
AppendToAsSourceOrExternalAccount
even for Token but I see now that this is wrong and I did not need to add the if inside the custom append. I will fix