-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add Taiwan overpass server as an alternative [is it OK to use it without explicit permission from silent owner?] #1464
Conversation
according to my research there is no usage limit over standard quota limitations and for usage that is directly improving OSM and especially one that should have insignificant number queries it should be perfectly fine
Did you contact the administrator of the instance? The question is also if it meets other requirements such as actuality, world-wide-coverage etc. |
I tried using Telegram, Facebook, Github, IRC as advised at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API#Public_Overpass_API_instances . So far all I got was reply on Telegram channel from somebody claiming that probably there is no usage policy and that maybe http://free.nchc.org.tw/pmwiki/index.php?n=FSLab.Contact will know more. I am usnsure about mailing people on http://free.nchc.org.tw/pmwiki/index.php?n=FSLab.Contact list - I worry that I may start badgering people that allowed someone to host some OSM services and I will discourage them from continuing. I now noticed contact form at https://osm.tw/contact/ - I used it. I decided to add it here without explicit permission from administrator as I expect that usage will be quite low. Also, given that it directly improves OSM and I point of public Overpass instance is that it will be used and SC has readable user agent I expect that it should be fine to use it.
According to my tests and #1389 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API#Public_Overpass_API_instances it is fine. |
Nothing new in Telegram group, FB messages and in other channels that used. Also, nobody responded to OsmHackTW/osmtw-ghpage#5 or OsmHackTW/osmtw-ghpage#4 |
Then I would not want to add it without explicit permission. There is also another reason to not add it if they are not responsive: It is a sign for that the instance is not well supported or may not be well supported in the future:
|
OK, in that case I am closing, deleting branch and posting patch in case they will answer in the future.
|
Sorry for the very late reply. The service is open to public according to our community Hackpad, however you'll be blocked if requesting a too short interval. |
Ok, then the server is definitely not eligible because StreetComplete does just that until overpass responds that the quota ran out. |
according to my research (I tried in multiple channels, I got a reply in the Telegram group ) there is no usage limit over standard quota limitations
and for usage that is directly improving OSM and especially one that should have insignificant number queries it should be perfectly fine
If anyone knows about usage policy that restricts usage more than quota system does - please, comment here (or in a new issue once that PR is closed)
My work on this pull request was sponsored by a NGI Zero Discovery grant