-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Line attachments on power poles/towers #4825
Comments
Is there some, even theoretical use of this data except "can be used for 3D rendering"? |
Yes, there are several use cases that aren't currently documented on wiki.
It helps saving dozen of gallon of gasoline each day and help decarbonize power network operation. OSM is the best option to gather such knowledge the operarors had lost along years or are unable to manage on their own. |
The illustrations are nice, however I think that this will be still too complex for the average-joe user and thus lead to a non-negligible amount of incorrect data added. E.g. in particular, it is not absolutely clear what the green things are and that in the anchor-picture, they are supposed to point at the viewer (just like the black dots in the other picture are pointing at the viewer). Also, see @matkoniecz . Professional users ... I think do not want to trust crowdsourced data by non-experts that is collected in a somewhat non-comprehensive manner (i.e. with STreetComplete) |
Hi @westnordost
Why ? |
My point is, that they shouldn't trust OSM data on line attachments on power towers when it is recorded by laymen. As I wrote, the current pictures are not clear enough and I do not think that it is possible to find pictures (that are displayed at that size) to be clear enough. |
Current experiments comparing very local test datasets from power operators and osm data show very good success rate and we are confident in building the French national database for power poles from crowdsourced data.
When I look to "wood" picture of power poles material quest, I find it clear enough for "suspension" option we are currently discussing. |
With laymen I meant StreetComplete users. I expect that OpenStreetMap contributors who currently add this data are much more interested (and more informed) about this thing than StreetComplete users will ever be. |
That's not what we currently observe in contributors' profile, both about OSM contributors and streetcomplete users on existing quests. Actually it's painful to not have user friendly tool to encourage such contribution. I don't worry about further contributors goodwill to gather the data. |
@westnordost I understand that you think main Stc users are not interested or don't have topic knowledge. Maybe add the quest but by default she is disabled? For me, on Stc the most important is icons/photos even if, I don't know the topic.
|
@Jean-BaptisteC As an alternative if it turns out not to be good fit for StreetComplete; perhaps SCEE ("Expert Edition") fork of StreetComplete might be a better fit for such quest, if you'd like easiness of StreetCopmplete on-the-ground mapping, but some domain knowledge is needed. SCEE is generally less concerned with all quests being easy to answer for newbie mappers (as all extra quests are disabled by default, and it is expected that target clientele are more advanced users which will only enable stuff they are well versed and interested in), so perhaps you may want to suggest it there if you think it would fit your use case. (of course if it turns out to be acceptable here in upstream StreetComplete itself afterall, all the better!) |
@westnordost what are the conditions for you take a decision about this quest? |
tbh, i think the operators already have way more detailed information about their network design and won't use openstreetmap as a reliable data source (at least for aspects, where they have their own, more detailed documents) for operational decisions. Nevertheless, here a cross-reference (maybe interesting/helpful): There is a new preset PR for this here openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema#1042 |
Hi
Had you asked them? |
Hmm... so mainly there were reservations regarding the usefulness 🚧 of the data but from what has been posted here, it looks like this data actually can be useful. It is likely also true that the line attachment is something that is usually not visible on aerial imagery, so a survey is necessary. 🐿️ Whether it is well visible by a pedestrian is unclear but I guess it is the best chance to find it out. So in general, a quest for this has similar issues as the For a PR
|
I would support with the PR but i cannot take care of the drawings, so if someone creates the drawings and writes the concise descriptions and how to tag each case i can do the rest. |
Hi Thanks @westnordost and @qugebert I can take care of drawings (or at least very clear pictures) and descriptions. |
General
Affected tag(s) to be modified/added: line_attachment
Question asked: How power line is attached on this support?
Checklist
Checklist for quest suggestions (see guidelines):
Ideas for implementation
Element selection: Attachments may be complex and sometimes a single support may have different attachments leading to complex tagging notation like line_attachment=(suspension|pin|suspension)|(anchor). That's not what we expect for streetcomplete quest.
We should only select nodes as power=pole,tower,insulator supports with:
Metadata needed: This quest is worldwide and no local metadata applies.
Proposed UI:
Drawings are took from wiki and could be enhanced/redrawn to meet streetcomplete's standards. We could use photos as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: