in map display access restrictions - fully restricted ways and barriers like fences and walls

[matkoniecz]

One may end not reaching quest because chosen route is blocked by access restriction/barriers like fences.

It is a bit irritating to end in such situation and discover that obstacle was mapped in OSM.

Would it be considered preferable to use map style that marks roads unavailable for foot travel and marks barrier=fence/wall, and potentially also other obstacles that make reaching to the destination impossible?

from #198 I understand that iff somebody forks current map style or makes new one from scratch it may be potentially used so I want to check whatever such canges would be considered as desirable

[matkoniecz]

It seems that currently Cinnabar from https://mapzen.com/products/maps/ is the currently used basemap. And it would mean that https://mapzen.com/documentation/tangram/tutorials/editing-basemaps/ is potentially useful.

[westnordost]

Makes sense Am 8. Mai 2017 08:44:49 MESZ schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]>:

…

One may end not reaching quest because chosen route is blocked by access restriction/barriers like fences. It is a bit irritating to end in such situation and discover that obstacle was mapped in OSM. Would it be considered preferable to use map style that marks roads unavailable for foot travel and marks barrier=fence/wall, and potentially also other obstacles that make reaching to the destination impossible? from #198 I understand that iff somebody forks current map style or makes new one from scratch it may be potentially used so I want to check whatever such canges would be considered as desirable -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #199

-- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

[matkoniecz]

https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/blob/604f6b02f797f8aafedeb0649d29da514501ab08/app/src/main/assets/cinnabar-style-7.0.0.yaml is location of the currently used style.

https://github.com/tangrams/cinnabar-style is repository of this style with showcase at http://tangrams.github.io/cinnabar-style/.

I am a bit confused by relation of code in these locations, StreetComplete is using version 7.0.0 while https://github.com/tangrams/cinnabar-style/commits/gh-pages has only version 0.12. Is it a correct guess that if one would use the same formatting of version number then street complete would be using v0.7 and current would be v0.12?

[matkoniecz]

In addition I opened issue at tangrams/cinnabar-style#26 ("show major barriers like barrier=fence or barrier=wall") to check whatever PR that adds showing wall/fences would be welcomed upstream

[westnordost]

I am a bit confused by relation of code in these locations, StreetComplete is using version 7.0.0 while https://github.com/tangrams/cinnabar-style/commits/gh-pages has only version 0.12

See https://github.com/tangrams/cinnabar-style/releases

Though, in danger to repeat myself: If there will be a custom style for street complete, it should start from a basic template, not one of these "house styles".

[matkoniecz]

What you mean by "house styles"? Focusing too much on buildings? Developed as showcase by company? Or something else?

[matkoniecz]

Updating cinnabar style will add fences - see tangrams/cinnabar-style@7d905d4

[matkoniecz]

This is released in https://github.com/tangrams/cinnabar-style/releases/tag/v7.0.1 and on the Mapzen CDN.

tangrams/cinnabar-style#26 (comment)

[westnordost]

What you mean by "house styles"? Focusing too much on buildings? Developed as showcase by company? Or something else?

Developed as showcase by the company

[matkoniecz]

For now I opened also tangrams/cinnabar-style#32