Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated docs to reflect proper params passed to webpack.config.js #5929

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2019

Conversation

dfee
Copy link

@dfee dfee commented Mar 6, 2019

Issue:

What I did

updated docs to reflect proper params passed to webpack.config.js

How to test

  • Is this testable with Jest or Chromatic screenshots?
    no [review changes]
  • Does this need a new example in the kitchen sink apps?
    no
  • Does this need an update to the documentation?
    that's what this is.

If your answer is yes to any of these, please make sure to include it in your PR.

updated docs to reflect proper params passed to webpack.config.js
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #5929 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5929   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   34.38%   34.38%           
=======================================
  Files         636      636           
  Lines        9374     9374           
  Branches     1348     1348           
=======================================
  Hits         3223     3223           
  Misses       5508     5508           
  Partials      643      643

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8998c58...eee5287. Read the comment docs.

@dfee
Copy link
Author

dfee commented Mar 6, 2019

@shilman @ndelangen @Hypnosphi i don't know how this passed previously (the block syntax wasn't modified). I'll leave it as a chore for you guys to either accept the patch as is, or remove the block syntax.

Copy link
Member

@shilman shilman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. Thanks for fixing this! 🏅

@shilman shilman added configuration babel / webpack documentation patch:yes Bugfix & documentation PR that need to be picked to main branch typescript labels Mar 6, 2019
@shilman shilman merged commit b19ae6b into storybookjs:master Mar 7, 2019
@shilman shilman added the patch:done Patch/release PRs already cherry-picked to main/release branch label Mar 7, 2019
shilman added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2019
updated docs to reflect proper params passed to webpack.config.js
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
configuration babel / webpack documentation patch:done Patch/release PRs already cherry-picked to main/release branch patch:yes Bugfix & documentation PR that need to be picked to main branch typescript
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants