Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addon Test: Use local storybook binary instead #30021

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kasperpeulen
Copy link
Contributor

@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen commented Dec 11, 2024

Closes #

What I did

Use local storybook binary instead for remove command

Checklist for Contributors

Testing

The changes in this PR are covered in the following automated tests:

  • stories
  • unit tests
  • integration tests
  • end-to-end tests

Manual testing

This section is mandatory for all contributions. If you believe no manual test is necessary, please state so explicitly. Thanks!

Documentation

  • Add or update documentation reflecting your changes
  • If you are deprecating/removing a feature, make sure to update
    MIGRATION.MD

Checklist for Maintainers

  • When this PR is ready for testing, make sure to add ci:normal, ci:merged or ci:daily GH label to it to run a specific set of sandboxes. The particular set of sandboxes can be found in code/lib/cli-storybook/src/sandbox-templates.ts

  • Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below:

    Available labels
    • bug: Internal changes that fixes incorrect behavior.
    • maintenance: User-facing maintenance tasks.
    • dependencies: Upgrading (sometimes downgrading) dependencies.
    • build: Internal-facing build tooling & test updates. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • cleanup: Minor cleanup style change. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • documentation: Documentation only changes. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • feature request: Introducing a new feature.
    • BREAKING CHANGE: Changes that break compatibility in some way with current major version.
    • other: Changes that don't fit in the above categories.

🦋 Canary release

This pull request has been released as version 0.0.0-pr-30021-sha-b1cc74da. Try it out in a new sandbox by running npx [email protected] sandbox or in an existing project with npx [email protected] upgrade.

More information
Published version 0.0.0-pr-30021-sha-b1cc74da
Triggered by @kasperpeulen
Repository storybookjs/storybook
Branch kasper/use-local
Commit b1cc74da
Datetime Wed Dec 11 11:33:45 UTC 2024 (1733916825)
Workflow run 12275506540

To request a new release of this pull request, mention the @storybookjs/core team.

core team members can create a new canary release here or locally with gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook canary-release-pr.yml --field pr=30021

name before after diff z %
createSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
generateSize 77.7 MB 77.7 MB 0 B 1.71 0%
initSize 133 MB 133 MB 0 B 0.6 0%
diffSize 55.1 MB 55.1 MB 0 B 0.58 0%
buildSize 6.87 MB 6.87 MB 0 B 0.69 0%
buildSbAddonsSize 1.51 MB 1.51 MB 0 B 0.6 0%
buildSbCommonSize 195 kB 195 kB 0 B - 0%
buildSbManagerSize 1.86 MB 1.86 MB 0 B 0.73 0%
buildSbPreviewSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
buildStaticSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
buildPrebuildSize 3.57 MB 3.57 MB 0 B 0.7 0%
buildPreviewSize 3.3 MB 3.3 MB 0 B 0.69 0%
testBuildSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbAddonsSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbCommonSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbManagerSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildSbPreviewSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildStaticSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildPrebuildSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
testBuildPreviewSize 0 B 0 B 0 B - -
name before after diff z %
createTime 7.5s 22.5s 14.9s 3.3 🔺66.6%
generateTime 22.5s 21.6s -928ms 0.39 -4.3%
initTime 16.7s 16.5s -161ms 1.4 -1%
buildTime 9.2s 8.8s -398ms -0.88 -4.5%
testBuildTime 0ms 0ms 0ms - -
devPreviewResponsive 5.4s 5.8s 367ms 0.56 6.3%
devManagerResponsive 3.9s 3.8s -64ms -0.27 -1.7%
devManagerHeaderVisible 603ms 676ms 73ms 0.93 10.8%
devManagerIndexVisible 671ms 749ms 78ms 1.11 10.4%
devStoryVisibleUncached 2.2s 2s -224ms 0.5 -11.2%
devStoryVisible 635ms 712ms 77ms 0.69 10.8%
devAutodocsVisible 694ms 557ms -137ms -0.14 -24.6%
devMDXVisible 684ms 585ms -99ms 0.38 -16.9%
buildManagerHeaderVisible 642ms 660ms 18ms 0.34 2.7%
buildManagerIndexVisible 733ms 770ms 37ms 0.47 4.8%
buildStoryVisible 581ms 589ms 8ms 0.32 1.4%
buildAutodocsVisible 535ms 433ms -102ms -0.58 -23.6%
buildMDXVisible 463ms 411ms -52ms -0.87 -12.7%

Greptile Summary

Based on the provided information, I'll create a concise summary of the PR changes:

Simplified the postinstall script in addon-test by refactoring how the interactions addon removal command is executed, using execa's template literal syntax instead of direct command execution.

  • Modified code/addons/test/src/postinstall.ts to use $ template literal syntax from execa for cleaner command execution
  • Maintains same functionality of removing @storybook/addon-interactions during installation
  • Keeps all existing package manager and config directory options intact
  • Uses local storybook binary instead of remote execution for better reliability

💡 (4/5) You can add custom instructions or style guidelines for the bot here!

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

1 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 11, 2024

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit b1cc74d. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 2 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic changed the title Addon-Test: Use local storybook binary instead Addon Test: Use local storybook binary instead Dec 12, 2024
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen merged commit db024c7 into next Dec 12, 2024
64 of 65 checks passed
@kasperpeulen kasperpeulen deleted the kasper/use-local branch December 12, 2024 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants