-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Fix Discord links and GH discussions #24713
Changes from 1 commit
b70264e
b8febe8
73d8397
629d497
574d824
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ While running in development mode, the builder's development server must be able | |
|
||
### More information | ||
|
||
This area is under rapid development, so the documented is still in progress and subject to change. If you are interested in writing your builder, we encourage you to check [webpack](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/tree/next/code/builders/builder-webpack5), [Vite](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/tree/next/code/builders/builder-vite), and Modern Web's [dev-server-storybook](https://github.com/modernweb-dev/web/blob/master/packages/dev-server-storybook/src/serve/storybookPlugin.ts) source code. In addition, we have a wonderful contributor community on [Storybook Discord](https://discord.gg/storybook) if you have questions. Ping us in the [#contributing](https://discord.com/channels/486522875931656193/839297503446695956) channel. | ||
This area is under rapid development, and the associated documentation is still in progress and subject to change. If you are interested in writing your builder, we encourage you to take a look at the source code for [Webpack](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/tree/next/code/builders/builder-webpack5), [Vite](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/tree/next/code/builders/builder-vite). Modern Web's [dev-server-storybook](https://github.com/modernweb-dev/web/blob/master/packages/dev-server-storybook/src/serve/storybookPlugin.ts) to get a better understanding of how to implement a builder for Storybook, when you are ready open a [RFC](../contribute/RFC.md) to discuss your proposal with the community and the maintainers. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hey @jonniebigodes. This second sentence has gotten kinda long. Could we simplify it by breaking it up into two sentences, like so: "If you are interested in creating a builder, you can learn more about implementing a builder in Storybook by checking the source code for Vite, Webpack, or Modern Web's dev-server-storybook. When you're ready, open an RFC to discuss your proposal with the Storybook community and maintainers." (with the links in, as before) |
||
|
||
#### Learn more about builders | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Storybook is a framework-agnostic tool. It can be used with any framework. Howev | |
|
||
### Legacy framework support | ||
|
||
We're deprecating support for several frameworks, including [Aurelia](https://github.com/aurelia/framework), [Marionette](https://github.com/marionettejs/backbone.marionette), [Mithril](https://github.com/MithrilJS/mithril.js), [Rax](https://github.com/alibaba/rax), and [Riot](https://github.com/riot/riot). Nevertheless, we're always looking for help maintaining these frameworks. If you're working with one of them and you want to continue supporting them, visit the dedicated [Storybook End-of-Life repository](https://github.com/storybook-eol) to learn more about the sunsetting process and for instructions on how to contribute visit our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/storybook). | ||
We're deprecating support for several frameworks, including [Aurelia](https://github.com/aurelia/framework), [Marionette](https://github.com/marionettejs/backbone.marionette), [Mithril](https://github.com/MithrilJS/mithril.js), [Rax](https://github.com/alibaba/rax), and [Riot](https://github.com/riot/riot). Nevertheless, we're always looking for help maintaining these frameworks. If you're working with one of them and you want to continue supporting them, visit the dedicated [Storybook End-of-Life repository](https://github.com/storybook-eol) to learn more about the sunsetting process and for instructions on how to contribute read our [documentation](https://storybook.js.org/docs/react/contribute/how-to-contribute). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Typo in final sentence, and we can simplify it too. Could change to: 'If you're working with one of them and you want to continue supporting them, visit the dedicated Storybook End-of-Life repository. To learn more about the sunsetting process and view instructions on how to contribute, read our documentation." |
||
|
||
### Learn about configuring Storybook | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Now, when you define a story or update an existing one, you'll automatically get | |
|
||
### The `satisfies` operator is not working as expected | ||
|
||
Out of the box, Storybook supports the `satisfies` operator for almost every framework already using TypeScript version 4.9 or higher. However, due to the constraints of the Angular and Web Components framework, you might run into issues when applying this operator for additional type safety. This is primarily due to how both frameworks are currently implemented, making it almost impossible for Storybook to determine if the component property is required. If you encounter this issue, we recommend reaching out to the maintainers using the default communication channels (e.g., [Discord server](https://discord.com/channels/486522875931656193/570426522528382976), [GitHub discussion](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/discussions/20988)). | ||
Out of the box, Storybook supports the `satisfies` operator for almost every framework already using TypeScript version 4.9 or higher. However, due to the constraints of the Angular and Web Components framework, you might run into issues when applying this operator for additional type safety. This is primarily due to how both frameworks are currently implemented, making it almost impossible for Storybook to determine if the component property is required. If you encounter this issue, we recommend reaching out to the maintainers using the default communication channels (e.g., [Discord's Angular Working Group channel](https://discord.com/channels/486522875931656193/855364585632038913), [Web Components Working Group channel](https://discord.com/channels/486522875931656193/855354327854350346), [GitHub discussions](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/discussions/20988)). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @joevaugh4n and @vanessayuenn It seems that we still have those channels available despite being archived, and we should retask them as a means to engage with maintainers and have a communication pipeline to address features such as this one. Let me know, and we'll take it from there. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think the working group channels are archived, though not super active. However, I think the working group channels should be for existing and potential contributors to discuss domain specific things, and not for offering support. This section is under "troubleshooting" so directing folks to "help" in discussion is more appropriate. What do you think? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @vanessayuenn I left the mention to those channels as it's the only place where we can follow up with anyone willing to help us with this issue/integration and have a faster point of contact to follow up with the maintainers. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hey, @jonniebigodes! Yes, to clarify, those channels aren't archived. They're still available under the 'working groups' category but are relatively inactive. Like Vanessa says, imo we should refer anyone with Angular support requests to discussions, as those wg channels are mostly for maintainer/contributor usage. Sound good? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. With my comment in mind, change last sentence to: "If you encounter this issue, please open up a support request on GitHub Discussions." |
||
|
||
### The TypeScript auto-completion is not working on my editor | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ Out of the box, Storybook has a set of components that you can use to customize | |
|
||
### The table of contents doesn't render as expected | ||
|
||
When using Autodocs's table of contents, you may encounter situations where it appears differently than expected. To help you resolve these problems, we have compiled a list of possible scenarios that may cause issues. If you've run into any of the items listed below and you're interested in helping us improve the support for this feature, we encourage you to reach out to the maintainers using the default communication channels (e.g., [Discord server](https://discord.com/channels/486522875931656193/570426522528382976), [GitHub issues](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/issues)). | ||
When using Autodocs's table of contents, you may encounter situations where it appears differently than expected. To help you resolve these problems, we have compiled a list of possible scenarios that may cause issues. | ||
|
||
#### With simple documentation pages | ||
|
||
|
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ Additionally, if you're developing using TypeScript, you may need to update Stor | |
|
||
<!-- prettier-ignore-end --> | ||
|
||
If you're still encountering issues, we recommend reaching out to the maintainers using the default communication channels (e.g., [Discord server](https://discord.com/channels/486522875931656193/570426522528382976), [GitHub issues](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/issues)). | ||
If you're still encountering issues, we recommend reaching out to the maintainers using the default communication channels (e.g., [GitHub discussions](https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/discussions/new?category=help)). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. imo, change 'reaching out to the maintainers' to 'reaching out to the community' |
||
|
||
#### Learn more about Storybook documentation | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@integrayshaun can you follow up with me on this and let me know of any feedback? The idea here is two-fold:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a great idea, @jonniebigodes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Appreciate the follow up on this @integrayshaun and glad you're onboard with this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bit of a tangent, but currently the template for "ideas" have these labels:
needs triage
andfeature requests
. Do they still make sense? I wonder if the recipe requests should have their own label.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm okay with having its own label @vanessayuenn , @integrayshaun are you ok with this as well? If so, we can create it, and I'll adjust the documentation accordingly. Let me know and we'll go from there.