Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/encode kwarg changes #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

stemann
Copy link
Owner

@stemann stemann commented Apr 21, 2024

No description provided.

@stemann stemann force-pushed the feature/encode_kwarg_changes branch from 1f9b2a1 to c07d8f9 Compare April 21, 2024 17:54
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.79%. Comparing base (8262b04) to head (71a2c82).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #8      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   24.00%   23.79%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         375      374       -1     
==========================================
- Hits           90       89       -1     
  Misses        285      285              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Provides the same default for quality (75) as the cwebp tool included with libwebp.

This necessitated adding a boolean lossy kwarg to encode.
@stemann stemann force-pushed the feature/encode_kwarg_changes branch from c07d8f9 to 71a2c82 Compare April 21, 2024 18:13
@stemann stemann marked this pull request as ready for review April 21, 2024 18:17
@stemann stemann merged commit 71a2c82 into master Apr 21, 2024
11 checks passed
@stemann stemann deleted the feature/encode_kwarg_changes branch April 21, 2024 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants