This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
Replace pseudocode CAP-33 examples with real SDK code. #254
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e1ef88e
Add example of sponsorship transfer/revocation
Shaptic f50ed2b
Update CAP-33 example to be comprehensive
Shaptic 9da840b
Fix unclosed CodeExample tag
Shaptic daeab21
Link to SignAndSend(...)
Shaptic 9fc83ec
Add missing import
Shaptic 7d8d93f
Add error checks and use clearer variable name
Shaptic File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like the transaction source account is
aAccount
, so the source account here doesn't have to be specified. I noticed in some of your other examples you do specify the source account even if it's equal to the transaction source account. Might be a good idea to keep the usage consistent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call, I'll consolidate this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed, I believe