Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix static check tests. #3005

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 15, 2020
Merged

Conversation

abuiles
Copy link
Contributor

@abuiles abuiles commented Sep 14, 2020

PR Checklist

PR Structure

  • This PR has reasonably narrow scope (if not, break it down into smaller PRs).
  • This PR avoids mixing refactoring changes with feature changes (split into two PRs
    otherwise).
  • This PR's title starts with name of package that is most changed in the PR, ex.
    services/friendbot, or all or doc if the changes are broad or impact many
    packages.

Thoroughness

  • This PR adds tests for the most critical parts of the new functionality or fixes.
  • I've updated any docs (developer docs, .md
    files, etc... affected by this change). Take a look in the docs folder for a given service,
    like this one.

Release planning

  • I've updated the relevant CHANGELOG (here for Horizon) if
    needed with deprecations, added features, breaking changes, and DB schema changes.
  • I've decided if this PR requires a new major/minor version according to
    semver, or if it's mainly a patch change. The PR is targeted at the next
    release branch if it's not a patch change.

What

Fixes the CI by removing a bunch of unused code and adding an explicit skip in the places where we know the linter would fail even if the code is being used.

Why

Make CircleCI green again.

Known limitations

[TODO or N/A]

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla: yes label Sep 14, 2020
@abuiles abuiles requested a review from a team September 14, 2020 21:51
//
// Note: The function panics if this account doesn't exist in the ledger yet, so
// be sure to fund it before doing this.
func (i *IntegrationTest) EstablishTrustline(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think @Shaptic will add later this in a different PR, but for now, since we don't use it, let's remove it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, this was used in the breaking claiming tests.

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
//lint:file-ignore U1001 Ignore all unused code, staticcheck doesn't understand testify/suite
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general we don't care about this internal txnbuild copy - so i removed a bunch of unused files and file-ignore in the new ones. We'll use them as we add more integration tests, but it doesn't really matter since eventually we'll remove these files in favor of the actual txnbuild

@abuiles abuiles merged commit 8179679 into stellar:protocol-14 Sep 15, 2020
@abuiles abuiles deleted the fix-static-check branch September 15, 2020 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants