You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using the "dumpxdr" command of stellar-archivist, it sometimes shows duplicated data in a place where it shouldn't be.
results-006bc07f.txt
For example, working on the file: results-006bc07f.xdr, taken from S3:
history.stellar.org/prd/core-testnet/core_testnet_001/results/00/6b/c0/results-006bc07f
Some of the transaction ids are duplicated and are in the wrong ledgers.
The transaction hash [93, 239, 45, 233, 97, 76, 223, 52, 226, 88, 7, 30, 244, 36, 148, 216, 53, 202, 46, 157, 111, 190, 191, 205, 135, 221, 119, 148, 248, 209, 78, 72] Or , 5def2de9614cdf34e258071ef42494d835ca2e9d6fbebfcd87dd7794f8d14e48
Appears multiple times across many ledgers in the file, even though it should only be in ledge 7061569 (according to horizon)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You can see that the hash that was specified in the original issue only appears once and in the correct ledger.
I would just want to confirm that this is an actual bug with archivist and not some misunderstanding that I have on how these XDR files work
When using the "dumpxdr" command of stellar-archivist, it sometimes shows duplicated data in a place where it shouldn't be.
results-006bc07f.txt
For example, working on the file: results-006bc07f.xdr, taken from S3:
history.stellar.org/prd/core-testnet/core_testnet_001/results/00/6b/c0/results-006bc07f
Some of the transaction ids are duplicated and are in the wrong ledgers.
The transaction hash
[93, 239, 45, 233, 97, 76, 223, 52, 226, 88, 7, 30, 244, 36, 148, 216, 53, 202, 46, 157, 111, 190, 191, 205, 135, 221, 119, 148, 248, 209, 78, 72] Or , 5def2de9614cdf34e258071ef42494d835ca2e9d6fbebfcd87dd7794f8d14e48
Appears multiple times across many ledgers in the file, even though it should only be in ledge 7061569 (according to horizon)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: