This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
Providing an example for retrieving contract code using getLedgerEntry
#281
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Is this too detailed? Is this even needed? Signed-off-by: Elliot Voris <[email protected]>
|
Preview is available here: |
paulbellamy
approved these changes
Jan 25, 2023
|
Preview is available here: |
Signed-off-by: Elliot Voris <[email protected]>
|
Preview is available here: |
Shuffling some things around a bit, and giving a better overview of the contract deployment process for Soroban. Co-authored-by: Paul Bellamy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Elliot Voris <[email protected]>
|
Preview is available here: |
paulbellamy
approved these changes
Jan 25, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I finally wrapped my mind around the process of retrieving a contract's byte-code and tried to distill that here. I may not have made it very "brief," but I think I got it to a pretty understandable state (??)
Is this too detailed? Is this even needed?