-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix operator RBAC rules #1084
Fix operator RBAC rules #1084
Conversation
kind: ClusterRole | ||
metadata: | ||
name: rhacs-operator | ||
namespace: stackrox-operator |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is superfluous for cluster-scoped resources
subjects: | ||
- kind: ServiceAccount | ||
name: rhacs-operator-controller-manager | ||
namespace: stackrox-operator |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this be rhacs
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, stackrox-operator is currently used for the operator deployment. It changes eventually to rhacs.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ludydoo, SimonBaeumer The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Description
Fix RBAC operator rules in fleetshard deployment.
These were missing when the fleetshard-based installation was introducded.
Currently this operator installation is protected by a feature flag and not used in production.
Checklist (Definition of Done)
Test manual
ROX-12345: ...
Test manual