Travis tests failing

[mixmix]

Tests pass locally, but the remote setup doesn't !

woop.

Looks like this (source)

> server started
Listening on :::8008 (multiserver net plugin)
Error: could not connect to sbot
    at /home/travis/build/ssbc/ssb-config/node_modules/ssb-client/index.js:100:23
    at /home/travis/build/ssbc/ssb-config/node_modules/multiserver/compose.js:66:24
    at Socket.<anonymous> (/home/travis/build/ssbc/ssb-config/node_modules/multiserver/plugins/net.js:42:11)
    at emitOne (events.js:116:13)
    at Socket.emit (events.js:211:7)
    at emitErrorNT (internal/streams/destroy.js:66:8)
    at _combinedTickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:139:11)
  Error: connect EADDRNOTAVAIL :::8008 - Local (:::0)
    at internalConnect (net.js:964:16)
    at defaultTriggerAsyncIdScope (internal/async_hooks.js:281:19)
    at net.js:1062:9
    at _combinedTickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:132:7)
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:181:9)

[christianbundy]

Is this because we're using :: rather than binding to 127.0.0.1? I saw a note in the comments that said something like "we're just using IPv4 because IPv6 breaks Travis" or something, but it looks like we've switched to IPv6 by default. Or maybe I'm misreading it?

[mixmix]

Yeah I think we need to check if we're in an ipv4/6 env then chose the default? I think Windows needs 127.0.0.1 as well even in ipv6... Just another complication

…

On Thu, 7 Mar 2019, 06:19 Christian Bundy, ***@***.***> wrote: Is this because we're using :: rather than binding to 127.0.0.1? I saw a note in the comments that said something like "we're just using IPv4 because IPv6 breaks Travis" or something, but it looks like we've switched to IPv6 by default. Or maybe I'm misreading it? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#37 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACitniUi9GP1RE5mB8p5LV8Hb-HpcWCBks5vT_ibgaJpZM4aVAfV> .

[dominictarr]

I saw the heading and immediately thought ipv6, obviously.

[stale]

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?