Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: Clarify acceleration refresh options #682

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

docs: Clarify acceleration refresh options #682

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

peasee
Copy link
Contributor

@peasee peasee commented Dec 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🗣 Description

  • Updates the docs for acceleration data refresh to clarify the behavior of options for:
    • refresh_sql
    • refresh_data_window
    • refresh_check_interval
    • refresh_jitter_*
    • retention_*

@peasee peasee self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
spiceai-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 17, 2024 0:03am

lukekim
lukekim previously approved these changes Dec 16, 2024
View reviewed changes
@peasee peasee marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 00:07
@peasee peasee requested a review from lukekim December 17, 2024 00:09
@peasee peasee merged commit 49dc9e8 into trunk Dec 17, 2024
3 checks passed
@peasee peasee deleted the docs/clarify-acceleration-refresh-options branch December 17, 2024 01:25
@peasee peasee mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sgrebnov sgrebnov sgrebnov approved these changes

@lukekim lukekim Awaiting requested review from lukekim

Assignees

@peasee peasee

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@peasee @lukekim @sgrebnov