Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refine doc on show loopback/mgmt interfaces #1958

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2021

Conversation

qiluo-msft
Copy link
Contributor

@qiluo-msft qiluo-msft commented Dec 3, 2021

What I did

Add explicit sections for showing management/loopback interfaces

How I did it

How to verify it

Previous command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)

New command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)

@qiluo-msft qiluo-msft force-pushed the qiluo/loshowdoc branch 4 times, most recently from a26192b to e470d8e Compare December 3, 2021 23:05
@qiluo-msft qiluo-msft changed the title Refine doc on show loopback/mgmt ports Refine doc on show loopback/mgmt interfaces Dec 3, 2021
@qiluo-msft qiluo-msft marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2021 23:09
@@ -254,6 +256,10 @@ By default, login takes the user to the default prompt from which all the show c

Go Back To [Beginning of the document](#) or [Beginning of this section](#basic-tasks)

### Show Management Interface

Please check [show ip interfaces](#show-ip-interfaces)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this mean there is no specific command only to show management and loopback interfaces? When these interfaces need to be shown, just call show ip interfaces and find the ones of interest?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Do you have any concern?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, just to clarify

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants