Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docker-base-stretch]: Do not check expire for stretch-backports repo #3958

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 1, 2020

Conversation

lguohan
Copy link
Collaborator

@lguohan lguohan commented Dec 31, 2019

Signed-off-by: Guohan Lu [email protected]

- What I did

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@lguohan lguohan merged commit 476be91 into sonic-net:master Jan 1, 2020
@lguohan lguohan deleted the base branch January 1, 2020 00:30
abdosi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2020
…#3958)

* [docker-base-stretch]: Do not check expire for stretch-backports repo

Signed-off-by: Guohan Lu <[email protected]>
lguohan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
… files (#3973)

This is an addendum to #3958, which also instructs apt to ignore the "Valid Until" date in Release files inside the slave containers, making a complete solution, much like the previously abandoned PR #2609. This patch also unifies file names and contents.

When the Debian team archives a repo, it stops updating the "Valid Until" date, thus apt-get will not apply updates for that repo unless we explicitly tell it to ignore the "Valid Until" date. Also, this has become an issue with active (i.e., non-archived) repos twice in the past year because the Debian folks seem to occasionally let the expiration lapse before updating the date. This will cause SONiC builds to fail with a message like E: Release file for http://debian-archive.trafficmanager.net/debian-security/dists/jessie/updates/InRelease is expired (invalid since 3d 3h 11min 20s). Updates for this repository will not be applied. until the dates have been updated and propagated to all mirrors. With this patch, SONiC should no longer be affected by lapsed "Valid Until" dates, whether they be accidental or purposeful.
abdosi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2020
… files (#3973)

This is an addendum to #3958, which also instructs apt to ignore the "Valid Until" date in Release files inside the slave containers, making a complete solution, much like the previously abandoned PR #2609. This patch also unifies file names and contents.

When the Debian team archives a repo, it stops updating the "Valid Until" date, thus apt-get will not apply updates for that repo unless we explicitly tell it to ignore the "Valid Until" date. Also, this has become an issue with active (i.e., non-archived) repos twice in the past year because the Debian folks seem to occasionally let the expiration lapse before updating the date. This will cause SONiC builds to fail with a message like E: Release file for http://debian-archive.trafficmanager.net/debian-security/dists/jessie/updates/InRelease is expired (invalid since 3d 3h 11min 20s). Updates for this repository will not be applied. until the dates have been updated and propagated to all mirrors. With this patch, SONiC should no longer be affected by lapsed "Valid Until" dates, whether they be accidental or purposeful.
pphuchar pushed a commit to SONIC-DEV/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2020
… files (sonic-net#3973)

This is an addendum to sonic-net#3958, which also instructs apt to ignore the "Valid Until" date in Release files inside the slave containers, making a complete solution, much like the previously abandoned PR sonic-net#2609. This patch also unifies file names and contents.

When the Debian team archives a repo, it stops updating the "Valid Until" date, thus apt-get will not apply updates for that repo unless we explicitly tell it to ignore the "Valid Until" date. Also, this has become an issue with active (i.e., non-archived) repos twice in the past year because the Debian folks seem to occasionally let the expiration lapse before updating the date. This will cause SONiC builds to fail with a message like E: Release file for http://debian-archive.trafficmanager.net/debian-security/dists/jessie/updates/InRelease is expired (invalid since 3d 3h 11min 20s). Updates for this repository will not be applied. until the dates have been updated and propagated to all mirrors. With this patch, SONiC should no longer be affected by lapsed "Valid Until" dates, whether they be accidental or purposeful.
tiantianlv pushed a commit to SONIC-DEV/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2020
… files (sonic-net#3973)

This is an addendum to sonic-net#3958, which also instructs apt to ignore the "Valid Until" date in Release files inside the slave containers, making a complete solution, much like the previously abandoned PR sonic-net#2609. This patch also unifies file names and contents.

When the Debian team archives a repo, it stops updating the "Valid Until" date, thus apt-get will not apply updates for that repo unless we explicitly tell it to ignore the "Valid Until" date. Also, this has become an issue with active (i.e., non-archived) repos twice in the past year because the Debian folks seem to occasionally let the expiration lapse before updating the date. This will cause SONiC builds to fail with a message like E: Release file for http://debian-archive.trafficmanager.net/debian-security/dists/jessie/updates/InRelease is expired (invalid since 3d 3h 11min 20s). Updates for this repository will not be applied. until the dates have been updated and propagated to all mirrors. With this patch, SONiC should no longer be affected by lapsed "Valid Until" dates, whether they be accidental or purposeful.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant