Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tunnel_pkt_handler]: Skip nonexistent intfs #12424

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2022

Conversation

theasianpianist
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee [email protected]

Why I did it

Sometimes the process will try to get the status of non-existent portchannel interfaces

How I did it

Skip the interface status check if the interface does not exist. In the future, when the interface is created/comes up this check will be triggered again.

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205

Description for the changelog

Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@theasianpianist theasianpianist merged commit 37ad8be into sonic-net:master Oct 20, 2022
yxieca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2022
- Skip the interface status check if the interface does not exist. In the future, when the interface is created/comes up this check will be triggered again.

Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <[email protected]>
qiluo-msft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2022
- Skip the interface status check if the interface does not exist. In the future, when the interface is created/comes up this check will be triggered again.

Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants