-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prevent load entities when pass empty choices for ModelType #6548
Prevent load entities when pass empty choices for ModelType #6548
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're currently trying to fix the psalm issue
Indeed, can you add tests @kirya-dev ? |
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ public function loadChoiceList($value = null) | |||
if (!$this->choiceList) { | |||
if ($this->query) { | |||
$entities = $this->modelManager->executeQuery($this->query); | |||
} elseif (\is_array($this->choices) && \count($this->choices) > 0) { | |||
} elseif (\is_array($this->choices)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given what is currently checked in the test, I think this is the only change required in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not only. If we keep ModelType with default option choices
with empty than on default entities dosent loaded
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then, that isn't checked in the test. I mean, if I change only this line and run simple-phpunit --filter ModelTypeTest::testGetOptions
, the test is passing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Must no passing becouse require method findBy calls once or never
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@phansys @VincentLanglet whyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When you're passing explicitly null in the test, it's working indeed.
But what if you're not passing a choice.
$options = $optionResolver->resolve(['model_manager' => $modelManager]);
It should keep calling the findBy
, but it won't anymore @phansys.
That's why I agree with @kirya-dev.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't analyzed the change, but if that is fine, I think the test must cover the case (the test provided in this PR is passing even if these changes are not applied).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kirya-dev Can you add a test with $options = $optionResolver->resolve(['model_manager' => $modelManager]);
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Of course. Added!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll abstain my approval for now, since I'd like to avoid to allow null
in an option intended to hold an array.
I'll try to find some time to check this locally. But if other contributors agree with this solution, I have no problem to get it merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've checked this locally, and I can't find a better approach than this 👍
If these comments are addressed, I'll consider this RTM.
Thanks @kirya-dev |
Subject
I am targeting this branch, because would like make better our admin.
Closes #6517.
Changelog