-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature - Epoch boundary recompilation phase #33477
Merged
Lichtso
merged 6 commits into
solana-labs:master
from
Lichtso:feature_transition_recompilation
Nov 9, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
79e40b5
Adds LoadedPrograms::upcoming_environments.
Lichtso ee5837a
Moves LoadedPrograms::prune_feature_set_transition() into LoadedProgr…
Lichtso 9837443
Adds parameter recompile to Bank::load_program().
Lichtso 7f68eff
Sets latest_root_slot/epoch and environments in Bank::finish_init().
Lichtso 47cdaea
Removes FEATURES_AFFECTING_RBPF list.
Lichtso a5db6d5
Adjusts test_feature_activation_loaded_programs_recompilation_phase().
Lichtso File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could a malicious leader trigger this check by adding a bank in a future epoch? Does it make sense to make this check more specific (e.g. new.epoch == loaded_programs_cache.latest_root_epoch + 1, and slot is within N slots in the new epoch)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aren't leaders bound by the leader schedule in that they can't just submit a block for any slot, but only the one they were assigned to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember seeing this in one of the outages where the leader submitted a slot way in future. Maybe its not an issue anymore due to other checks.
Would making this check more strict cause any problems? It can be done in a separate PR if that's preferred.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/1814b2bc81aca29b322f8e1f280494c1b9ee6b32/turbine/src/sigverify_shreds.rs#L141C6-L141C6
Probably not, but haven't thought it through.